Billion dollar refineries are closed in
one part of the world, while others open elsewhere. This is the
craziness of the global capitalist economy. It wastes huge amounts of
material and human resources, whereas these same resources could be
used in a global plan to develop the economy in way more in line with
the interests of all the people of the world.
Refinery workers in France are quite right to fight against looming
plant closures. While from a short-sighted profit point of view up to
100 refineries will have to close in the coming decade, mainly in
Europe and the US, it makes absolute sense to keep them open from a
social point of view. Trade unionists around the world have to raise
the debate to this level.
Following the crisis of the 1970s, hundreds of plants were closed
down during the 1980s. This represented a colossal waste in labour
power and other resources as in later upswings new refineries had to be
built again.
Today a similar wave of shutdowns is under way. Due to a combination
of different factors, the cuts will be particularly severe. Even before
the current economic crisis, demand in Europe, the US and Japan had
begun to decline. Heating oil for instance has been increasingly
replaced by natural gas in Europe. The use of fuel oil in power
generation has been in decline too. Furthermore, cars have become more
energy efficient. All this has been pressuring demand for refinery
fuels.
In addition to these factors, the introduction of mandatory blending
of so-called bio-fuels (fuels made from the seeds and fruits of plants)
in the US and the EU has aggravated the trend. This crazy policy has
nothing to do with environmental concerns. Sensing that their grip over
the ex-colonial, oil producing world is slipping, imperialist countries
have been trying to create an oil industry at home.
This has created all sorts of environmental problems and bio-fuel
production has crowded out food production, contributing to the price
spikes in basic foodstuff in recent years. While the bio-fuel volumes
blended into the gasoline and diesel pools are hopelessly inadequate to
give the US and Europe any significant advantage in terms of oil supply
security, the introduction of biofuels has contributed to the fall in
demand for refinery based oil products.
As a result of all these factors – and severely aggravated by the
economic downturn – demand for refinery products in the US, Europe and
Japan is expected to fall throughout the next decade even if economic
growth were to miraculously return to the already poor level of the
2000s.
Industry analysts are currently pumping out studies proving the
inevitability of large scale refinery closures. In the next 10 years or
so, crude refining capacity of about 10 million barrels per day (b/d)
could shut – most of this will likely occur in the US, Europe and
Japan. This is the equivalent of 11% of the world’s total refining
capacity. Of around 660 refineries worldwide, some 100 refineries could
close. In addition to the workers at those refineries, port workers,
maintenance workers etc. will also lose their jobs.
As a rule of thumb, a refinery cannot be run below 80% of capacity
for an extended period of time. Today, utilisation rates at many
refineries around the world have fallen below this critical threshold.
A total of 9 refineries in the US, the UK, France, Japan and Ivory
Coast have already been closed over the past year. Many more are
currently “under review”.
So is it really necessary to shut down all these refineries? No, it
is simply a result of capitalist anarchy. Africa and Latin America have
a large growth potential, but nobody is taking the initiative to
develop this potential. Furthermore countries such as China, India and
Middle Eastern countries have seen demand growing at a rapid pace.
Large new refining projects have been developed in these countries,
most of them in order to meet the expected large increases in demand in
these countries, but some also in order to target American and European
markets and crowd out existing plants.
This is truly a crazy system – refineries with a total capacity of
some 10 million b/d will come onstream in the next ten years mainly in
China, India and the Middle East, which is around as much as is
expected to close in Europe and the US.
Now it is no minor task to build a refinery. A refining complex
comes with a price tag of around 5-15 billion dollars depending on the
size and complexity of the facility. Tens of thousands of people work
for many years to create these huge facilities. What makes these
projects even more hazardous under capitalism is that these
super-projects are based on the expectation of high demand growth rates
in these countries. If a severe recession wipes out demand in these
countries, global demand and supply may not balance out and an even
more brutal struggle over markets could ensue.
How much more sense would it make to approach the problem of meeting
growing energy needs from a social, global perspective! Existing
refining capacity could be used to meet the current needs, shipping the
surplus to the regions where demand is growing. At the same time,
engineers who otherwise would have spent their time and creativity on
creating new refining complexes could develop entirely new industries
in the countries were the new refineries would have been located. This
would indeed be the most effective way of finding a path away from the
dependency on oil and emitting ever higher volumes of greenhouse gases.
Only once these new technologies have been developed to replace the oil
industry does it make sense to close refineries, and workers could be
employed in other sectors where they can contribute to the wealth of
society.
Of course, bourgeois commentators will shout that this is no more
than a utopian pipedream. We agree that the capitalist class, riddled
as they are with national vested interests, will never be able to
achieve such a Herculean task. They distrust one another, and would
rather see the environment destroyed than have their power slip from
their hands. However, refinery workers and engineers have no such
interests. It is their task to develop an alternative to this
capitalist nightmare of wasting resources on a massive scale. Trade
unions in all countries could organise regional and international
congresses to discuss the future of the industry and present a worked
out plan to the public. In this way, they could be seen as a beacon of
hope by the whole of society, rather than mere "defenders of an
economic past that has outlived itself" as the bourgeoisie will
portrait it.
This could be an inspiration to workers in other sectors
such as cars and steel which suffer from similar problems. Trade unions
would truly become the “schools of socialism” as all the workers
involved immediately understand that today’s problems can only be
solved on an international basis by working together globally. The
capitalist press can scream that without holy competition people are
not willing to work, while their masters move to dismantle whole
industries. It is time for the trade union movement to take up this
task.
International Marxist Tendency