US Base in South Korea threatens China

The resistance is a grassroots movement that goes well beyond the issue of the island’s militarization. Human rights, the environment and free speech are also at stake.

Jeju Island, 50 miles southeast of South Korea’s mainland, has been called the most idyllic place on the planet. The pristine, 706-square-mile volcanic island comprises three UNESCO World Natural Heritage sites.

Jeju’s history, however, is far from idyllic. In 1948, two years before the outbreak of the Korean War, the islanders staged an uprising to protest, among other issues, the division of the Korean Peninsula into North and South. The mainland government, then under U.S. military occupation, cracked down on the Jeju insurgents.

South Korean police and military forces massacred islanders and destroyed villages. Korea historian John Merrill estimates that the death toll may have exceeded 30,000, about 15 percent of the island’s population.

Decades later, a government commission investigated the Jeju uprising. In 2005, Roh Moo-hyun, then South Korea’s president, apologized for the atrocities and designated Jeju as an “Island of World Peace.”

Today Jeju Island is once again threatened by joint U.S.-South Korean militarization and violence: the construction of a naval base on what many consider to be Jeju’s most beautiful coastline.

For more than four years, island residents and peace activists have engaged in determined resistance to the base, risking their lives and freedom.

The stakes are high for the world as well. Recently the Korean JoongAng Daily, in Seoul, described the island as “the spearhead of the country’s defense line”—a line recklessly located 300 miles from China.

In these troubled waters, the Jeju base would host up to 20 American and South Korean warships, including submarines, aircraft carriers and destroyers, several of which would be fitted with the Aegis ballistic-missile defense system.

For the United States, the base’s purpose is to project force toward China—and to provide a forward operating installation in the event of a military conflict. The last thing the world needs is brinksmanship between the U.S. and China.

The protest now taking place on Jeju counts as a critical struggle against a potentially devastating war in Asia, and against the deeply rooted institutional structures that are driving the world toward ever more conflict.

Not surprisingly, China sees the base as a threat to its national security. At the very least, the base is likely to trigger confrontation and an arms race between South Korea and China, with the U.S. almost inevitably involved. Failure to prevent this dangerous, destructive project may well have consequences reaching far beyond Asia.

We need not speculate how Washington would react were China to establish a base near the U.S. coast.

The new base on Jeju is located in Gangjeong, a farming and fishing village that has reluctantly become the site of an epic battle for peace.

The resistance is a grassroots movement that goes well beyond the issue of the island’s militarization. Human rights, the environment and free speech are also at stake. Though small and remote, Gangjeong is an important battleground for all who believe in social justice worldwide.

South Korea started construction of the base in January but protests halted the work in June.

An eyewitness reports that the villagers’ nonviolent resistance has led to arrests targeting filmmakers, bloggers, clerics, activists on social-network websites—and most notably, the leaders of the movement.

Last month, riot police broke up a nonviolent rally and arrested more than three dozen activists, including the mayor of Gangjeong; the leader of one of the most effective peace groups in Korea; and a Catholic priest.

Basic democratic ideals are also under threat. In the 2007 vote to authorize the construction of the naval base, 87 people, some of whom reportedly were bribed, decided the fate of an entire village of 1,900 and an island of more than a half-million people.

Islanders were told that the military base would double as a tourism hub for cruise ships — indeed, that it would be the only means for such ships to dock at the island, yielding commercial benefits. The claim is hardly credible, if only because at the same time, on a different shore, a massive port expansion project has been underway and could be completed by summer 2012. It has already been announced that this new port will host cruise liners.

Gangjeong villagers know full well what their future holds if their cry for peace is not heeded: an influx of South Korean and foreign military personnel, advanced armaments, and a world of suffering delivered to a small island that has already endured enough. The irony is that the seeds for future superpower conflict are being sown on an ecological preserve and island of peace.

© The New York Times News Service/Syndicate
ABOUT THIS AUTHOR

Noam Chomsky is Institute Professor & Professor of Linguistics (Emeritus) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the author of dozens of books on U.S. foreign policy. He writes a monthly column for The New York Times News Service/Syndicate.

===================

Conflicts over naval base resurface on Jeju

By Lee Hyo-sik

A controversy surrounding the naval base to be built on a small fishing village of Jeju Island seemed to be all but over after the court allowed the Navy to resume its construction in early September.

But the recent apprehension of university students and activists who illegally broke into the construction site in Gangjeong Village rekindled the long-standing conflict between those opposing the planned base and the Navy.

On Oct. 2, the Seogwipo Police Station arrested 11 university students on charges of hampering civil services after they climbed over a fence set up around the construction site. Four unionized workers of Hanjin Heavy Industries were also detained on the same charge after they assaulted police officers at the scene.

The following day, all of them were released as police decided to book them without physical detention.

But the Gangjeong Village Union who oppose the construction of the disputed naval base and the Pan-Jeju Committee against the military station on the island claimed that the university students who broke into the construction site were physically abused by Navy personnel.

In a press briefing held at Jeju Special Self-Governing Provincial Council, Tuesday, members of the two organizations said the Navy threatened an activist protesting against the base construction and confiscated his belongings by force.

“Navy personnel also used violence against the university students. All these show that the envisioned naval base has been planned and built by a group of thugs who are not afraid to use violence against those who oppose it,’’ they said in a statement.

They accused politicians and law enforcement authorities of turning a blind eye to a range of wrongdoings committed by the Navy and others undertaking the base construction.

“Soldiers willingly used violence against civilians. The military should launch an investigation into such irregularities and discipline those responsible,’’ it said.

Some of the university students and activists were present at the briefing, insisting that they were beaten by soldiers

Meanwhile, the Seogwipo Police Station said Wednesday that they detained nine priests and one Internet media reporter for illegally entering Gangjeong and holding a protest on Tuesday.

Police said they climbed over a two-meter-high fence and held a placard that reads, “We strongly oppose the construction of the Naval base’’ for an hour.

Police tried to persuade the demonstrators to voluntarily leave but they refused. Police officers then had to be mobilized to disperse and arrest protesters on charges of breaking laws governing public assembly and obstructing justice.

On Sept. 2, police dispersed and rounded up protesters at Gangjeong, clearing the way for the Navy to resume construction of a base there.

Construction workers erected a 200-meter-long fence to link the already existing steel wall along the 1.6-kilometer perimeter of the site to block protesters from entering and preventing construction.

The longstanding dispute at the small fishing village began in 2007 when the government designated it as the site for a new naval base.

Some residents and civic groups oppose the construction, arguing it will cause environmental problems on the island.

They also argue the government and Navy have pushed ahead with the plan without reaching a consensus with them.

Strongly refuting such claims, the Navy said that the naval base will be built in an eco-friendly manner and help boost the local economy as well as bolster coastal defense.

A total of 977 billion won will be spent to construct the 480,000-square-meter base by 2014 with over 130 billion won spent already, according to the Navy.

leehs@koreatimes.co.kr

Source URL