By T.J. Coles. Axis of Logic
Editor's Comment: T.J. Coles' report, Proof of Chemtrails in Australia, South Africa, Mexico, debunks the claims of the U.S., British and Canadian governments below, taken from a Wikipedia article titled Chemtrail conspiracy theory:
|
The chemtrail conspiracy theory holds that some contrails are actually chemicals or biological agents deliberately sprayed at high altitudes for a purpose undisclosed to the general public. Versions of the chemtrail conspiracy theory circulating on the internet and radio talk shows theorize that the activity is directed by government officials. As a result, federal agencies have received thousands of complaints from people who have demanded an explanation. The existence of chemtrails has been repeatedly refuted by government agencies and scientists around the world.
The United States Air Force has stated that the theory is a hoax which "has been investigated and refuted by many established and accredited universities, scientific organizations, and major media publications". The British Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has stated that chemtrails "are not scientifically recognised phenomena". The Canadian Government House Leader has stated that "The term 'chemtrails' is a popularized expression, and there is no scientific evidence to support their existence."
The term chemtrail is derived from "chemical trail" in the similar fashion that contrail is an abbreviation for condensation trail. It does not refer to common forms of aerial spraying such as crop dusting, cloud seeding or aerial firefighting. The term specifically refers to aerial trails allegedly caused by the systematic high-altitude release of chemical substances not found in ordinary contrails, resulting in the appearance of supposedly uncharacteristic sky tracks. Believers of this theory speculate that the purpose of the chemical release may be for global dimming, population control, weather control, or biowarfare and claim that these trails are causing respiratory illnesses and other health problems. |
Have "The existence of chemtrails ... been repeatedly refuted by government agencies and scientists around the world?" Are chemtrails only a "conspiracy theory" in the heads of a few alarmists? Are they nothing more than "a hoax" as the U.S. Air Force says? Why do governments and "their" scientists so strongly deny the existence of chemtrails? Nobody more intelligent or reputable than you the reader can decide after weighing the evidence.
- Les Blough, Editor
Every four years since 1973, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) has convened to discuss global weather modification operations.1 A recent report confirms that, “From the 1950s through the 1980s, Australia was at the forefront of cloud seeding research, primarily through the Commonwealth Science and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO).”2
|
|
| A billboard in Sydney, Australia bringing government sponsored chemtrails to public attention. |
The report goes on to confirm governmental approval for planned cloud seeding operations into 2011. Is it a coincidence that when these operations intensified, Australia experienced some of its worst-ever floods?3 The CSIRO collaboration is interesting, given that Britain’s early cloud seeding experiments resulted in the deaths of thirty-five people when the village of Lynmouth, Devon (England), was flooded in cloud seeding experiments in the early 1950s.4
Operation Cumulus, as it was called, involved a team of “international scientists” who used chemicals supplied by the ICI company.5 Recent Ministry of Defence (UK) documents confirm that New Zealand, Australia, America, Canada and Britain have collaborated on aerosolised biochemical vaccination experiments.6 Around that time, the issue of chemtrails was raised—and ridiculed—in the New Zealand Parliament.7
|
|
|
At the Conciousness Beyond Chemtrails conference, Bruce Douglas revealed a new method of aerosol deployment he calls “chembombs” - that appear as wispy, cotton candy cirrus clouds. Satellite images and ground observations suggest the “Chembombs” appears to be replacing the more familiar persistent jet trails that observers have been calling “chemtrails” for nearly two decades. High on the list of suspects for deployment of “chembombs” is the fleet of Evergreen Air B-747 tankers equipped with Evergreen’s own patented aerosol deployment system capable of spraying a wide variety of aerosols depending on the mission. (source) |
|
|
|
The new version of chemtrails, being developed by the United States Air Force promises to feature aerial dumps of programmable "smart" molecules tens of thousands of times smaller than the particles already landing people in emergency rooms with respiratory, heart and gastrointestinal complaints. Under development since 1995, the military's goal is to install microprocessors incorporating gigaflops computer capability into "smart particles" the size of a single molecule. (source) |
The WMO report also notes “Hygroscopic seeding methods, similar to that undertaken in South Africa and Mexico,” two countries in which people have also noticed chemtrails: the long, thick, persistent, spreading cirrus clouds left by unmarked planes that deviate from commercial flight paths and perform manoeuvres impossible for commercial planes, such as making u-turns, near-vertical trajectories, and crossing one another’s paths.
READ MORE ANALYSES & ESSAYS BY
T.J. COLES, AXIS OF LOGIC COLUMNIST
NOTES
1. World Meteorological Organization, “Expert Team on Weather Modification”.
2. Anthony Morrison, Steven Siems, Michael Manton, Alex Nazarov, John Denholm, Roger Stone, “AN OVERVIEW OF CURRENT CLOUD SEEDING RESEARCH IN AUSTRALIA AND AN ANALYSIS OF THE TASMANIAN CLOUD SEEDING OPERATIONS FROM 1964 TO 2005” in World Meteorological Organization and World Weather Research Programme, Ninth WMO Scientific Conference on Weather Modification (Antalya, Turkey, 22-24 October 2007), WMP No. 44, Geneva: United Nations.
3. BBC News Online, “Australia floods: Brisbane braces for surge”, 11 January, 2011.
4. BBC News Online, “Rain-making link to killer floods,” 30 August, 2001,
5. John Vidal and Helen Weinstein, “RAF rainmakers ‘caused 1952 flood’,” Guardian, 30 August, 2001, and Sally Pook, “Deadly flood blamed on RAF rainmakers,” Telegraph, 31 August, 2001,
6. Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Ministry of Defence (UK)), Annual Report and Accounts 2009/10, London: MoD.
7. New Zealand Parliament, “8. Aerial Spraying—Petition and Submissions”, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) for Tuesday, 15 June 2010,
Print This 
Print This 