axis
Fair Use Notice
  Axis Mission
 About us
  Letters/Articles to Editor
Article Submissions
RSS Feed


No War for Bernard Henri Lévy Printer friendly page Print This
By Diana Johnstone. Counterpunch. Commentary & Photos by Axis of Logic
Counterpunch. Axis of Logic
Thursday, Sep 5, 2013

Editor's Note: Most people suspect at some level that it is Israel who is the driving force behind the US/European wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and now, Syria. A few weeks ago a regular Axis of Logic reader who supports Israel demanded that we "show evidence" that Israel is involved in the war in Syria. Our response did not satisfy the reader. Perhaps this article will help as  Diana Johnstone reveals the role of Zionist Bernard-Henri Lévy (BHL) in the push for war against the Syrian people. He was also heavily invested in the drive for US/NATO forces to destroy Libya. He recently called for France and the West to "intervene" in Syria with the debut of his new documentary The Oath of Tobruk at the Cannes Film Festival. On May 25, 2012, BHL told The Independent (UK)

“I made this film for Syria. It is time for us to intervene. One of the targets of movie is to show what can be done in Syria. I know that it is possible to do, it is feasible and it is doable and it's a shame that it is not done and this is why the movie is done, to show what can be done.“

Israel has been playing a hidden hand in all these wars and now would have the world believe that they are not involved in the installation and arming of terrorist groups who have created so much chaos, suffering and death in Syria over the last 30 months.  In her article below, Diana Johnstone exposes one of the key figures behind the disaster in Syria and the photos we have added within and below her article show more of the the Israeli connection. (all photos and captions presented by Axis of Logic)
- Les Blough, Editor
Axis of Logic

Bernard Henri Lévy is a sayan.* - According to Victor Ostrovsky (By Way of Deception), a sayan (pl. sayanim), is Hebrew for "assistant", a term for a Mossad operative recruited from among the Jewish Diaspora to help the Mossad with operations outside Israel, utilising the capacity of their own nationality to procure assistance. (Source)

The American people do not want US armed forces to get involved in the civil war in Syria. The United Nations will not back US bombing of Syria. The British Parliament does not want to get involved in bombing Syria. World public opinion is opposed to US bombing Syria. Not even NATO wants to take part in bombing Syria.  So who wants the United States to bomb Syria?

The same people who brought us the war in Iraq, that’s who.

On August 27, the Foreign Policy Initiative, a reincarnation of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) that dictated the Bush 2 administration’s disastrous foreign policy, issued its marching orders to Obama. In an open letter to the President, the FPI urged “a decisive response to Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad’s recent large-scale use of chemical weapons”.

The neocon “foreign policy experts” skipped over the pathos designed to arouse feelings of guilt in ordinary Americans for sitting in front of their television sets and “doing nothing”.  Rather, their argument is based on power projection.  Once Obama set a “red line”, he must react to “show the world”.
“Left unanswered, the Assad regime’s mounting attacks with chemical weapons will show the world that America’s red lines are only empty threats.”

The FPI told Obama that the United States should consider “direct military strikes against the pillars of the Assad regime”, not just to get rid of the chemical weapons threat, “but also to deter or destroy the Assad regime’s airpower and other conventional military means of committing atrocities against civilian non-combatants.”

At the same time, “the United States should accelerate efforts to vet, train, and arm moderate elements of Syria’s armed opposition, with the goal of empowering them to prevail against both the Assad regime and the growing presence of Al Qaeda-affiliated and other extremist rebel factions in the country.” The United States should “help shape and influence the foundations for the post-Assad Syria”.

In short, what is called for is a full-scale regime change, getting rid of both the existing regime and its main military opposition, and putting in power supposed “moderate elements of Syria’s armed opposition”, who by all accounts are the weakest in the field.

So, after failing to produce such nice, moderate results in Iraq or Afghanistan, try, try again.

The most familiar names among the 78 signatories included Elliott Abrams, Max Boot, Douglas J. Feith, Robert Kagan, Lawrence F. Kaplan, Joseph I. Lieberman, Martin Peretz, and Karl Rove.  No surprises there.

The novelty on the list was the signature of Bernard-Henri Levy.

Not surprising either, when you stop to think about it.  After all, Bernard-Henri Levy is widely credited with having persuaded former French president Nicolas Sarkozy to lead the charge that overthrew Kaddafi and delivered Libya to its current chaos.

After such an accomplishment, the Parisian dandy naturally feels entitled to tell the United States President what to do.

Levy with terrorists he took out of Libya to Cannes Film Festival
I vividly recall Bernard-Henri Levy reacting with the mock indignation that serves as his usual shield from criticism to claims that the Benghazi rebels included Islamic extremists with ties to al Qaeda.  Outrageous! he vociferated.  He had been to Benghazi and seen for himself that the folks there were all liberal democrats who just wanted to enjoy free elections and multicultural harmony.  Not so very much later, liberated Benghazi was sending Islamist fighters to destabilize Mali, recruiting Islamists to fight in Syria and assassinating a U.S. ambassador.  This turn of events has not fazed the media star the French call “BHL” in the slightest.  Although widely ridiculed and even hated in France, his influence persists.

In 2010, the writer Jacob Cohen published a novel entitled “Le Printemps des Sayanim”*. Despite the usual disclaimer, the novel was a roman à clés. A main character, named MST, was described in this fiction by an Israeli diplomat in Paris as follows:

“MST is of capital importance to us. He is worth more than a hundredsayanim. […] He covers a large part of the left for us. Inasmuch as he ‘criticizes’ Israel, what he says is taken seriously. That way he can get our interests into a lot of media.  […] Moreover, that man has incredible networks, in the most influential circles in Europe, in America. He can call Sarkozy whenever he wants, or the king of Morocco, or the president of the European Commission. […]”

No French reader would have any trouble recognizing BHL, although, of course, this was fiction.

But the question deserves to be raised: why has the real BHL been so keen to overthrow governments in Libya and Syria?  Even if the countries fall apart?

Perhaps this flashy dilettante thinks these wars are good for Israel.  BHL’s devotion to Israel is as conspicuous as his white v-neck shirts and back-swept hairdo.  Perhaps he fantasizes that if all the surrounding countries are in hopeless shambles, “the only democracy in the Middle East” will be the only tree left standing in the forest.

But even Israeli intelligence, which is a major source of US assessment of happenings in the region, doubts that Assad’s chemical weapons are a threat to Israel.

Giora Inbar, the former head of the IDF’s liaison unit in southern Lebanon, was quoted by the August 27 Times of Israel as saying that “there would be no logic in Assad attacking Israel”.

Inbar said that Israeli military intelligence made a priority of intelligence-gathering in Syria, was very well-informed, and was widely trusted. The United States was “aware of” Israel’s intelligence on the doings of the Syrian regime, “and relies upon it.”

Still, Israeli officials are not hyping the incident the way John Kerry did, insisting on deliberate murder of children.

The New York Times on Tuesday quoted an Israeli official as saying:

“It’s quite likely that there was kind of an operational mistake here […] I don’t think they wanted to kill so many people, especially so many children. Maybe they were trying to hit one place or to get one effect and they got a much greater effect than they thought.”

All that is speculation.  But the most plausible hypothesis so far is that the incident was an accident.  Indeed, rebel sources themselves have been quoted as saying that the incident occurred as a result of their own mishandling of chemical weapons obtained from Saudi Arabia.   In that case, the victims were the “collateral damage” so frequent in war. War is a series of unintended consequences.

The most obvious unintended consequence of US air strikes on Syria, if they happen, will be the total collapse of whatever pro-American sentiment may be left in the world, and a furious backlash against Israel, which is widely seen as the influence behind US policy in the Middle East.  Some Israelis are fully aware of this.

The New York Times quoted former Israeli ambassador to the United States Itamar Rabinovich as warning that it would be “a mistake to overplay the Israeli interest” in striking Syria. “It’s bad for Israel that the average American gets it into his or her mind that boys are again sent to war for Israel. They have to be sent to war for America.”

If not for Israel, why do boys, or girls, or missiles, have to be sent at all?

And the best way to prevent the backlash against Israel and its supporters is to call a halt to the whole project of using US military force in Syria.

But whatever happens, the reckless adventurer Bernard-Henri Levy can retire to his palatial villa in Marrakech, and dream up some new scheme.

*Sayanim is a Hebrew word (singular sayan) defined by Wikipedia “passive agents most usually called “sleeping agents” established outside Israel, ready to help Mossad agents out of feelings of patriotism toward Israel.

Source: Counterpunch


Photos of Bernard Henri Lévy visiting Israel and other countries
(added by Axis of Logic)





Speaking in Israel


with Shimon Perez


with Netanyahu

with an Israeli pilot


"learning philosophy" He is branded as an "intellectual and philosopher"


with Ehud Barak


with Ehud Olmert


with Menachem Begin as a younger man

From left: Bernard-Henri Lévy with French president Nicolas Sarkozy; Mahmoud Jibril, chairman of the National Transitional Council later to become the west's puppet government of Libya and British PM, David Cameron on their visit to Libya on September 15, 2011, celebrating the US/NATO bombing and destruction of the country.


speaking at a rally for the "liberation" of Iranian women


Bernard-Henri Lévy with his wife, Arielle Dombasle, French-American model, actress and singer. Dombasle's grandfather, Maurice Garreau-Dombasle, was a close friend of and advisor to Charles de Gaulle and served as the French ambassador to Mexico.


BHL with John Garang de Mabior (1945 – 2005) who was a Sudanese politician From 1983 to 2005, he headed the terrorists, aka "Sudan People's Liberation Army" in the Second Sudanese Civil War, in which one and half million people were killed. Garang also briefly served as First Vice President of Sudan from 9 July 2005 until he died in a 30 July 2005 helicopter crash which some say was caused by "external factors." Gill Lusk (BBC) described Garang in his obituary, "John Garang did not tolerate dissent and anyone who disagreed with him was either imprisoned or killed". The civil war ended with a division of Sudan into north and south Sudan, opening the flow of petroleum to western countries. See Israelis Begins Their Assault on the South Sudan, its People & their Environment by Axis of Logic.



BHL with Abdul Rashid Dostum in Afghansitan. Dostum joined the U.S. war against the Taliban in November 2001 and led the notorioous Northern Alliance. He was with the Northern Alliance, fighting alongside the US Special Forces against the Taliban were responsible for the Dasht-i-Leili massacre when they  intentionally suffocated as many as 2,000 prisoners in container trucks following the Taliban surrender of Kunduz.


BHL with Ahmad Shah Massoud who joined armed opposition to the Taliban in 1996. He was the military and political leader of the Northern Alliance which called itself the "United Islamic Front". He was assassinated  in a suicide bombing on September 9, 2001, just two days before the September 11 attacks when the US aligned itself with Massaud's forces. In his speech to the European Parliament he warned of a major terrorist attack on the US several months before 9/11. Declassified Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) documents from November 2001 showed that Massoud had "limited knowledge... regarding the intentions of [Al-Qaeda] to perform a terrorist act against the U.S. on a scale larger than the 1998 bombing of the U.S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania."


with terrorists in Libya before the destruction of the country


© Copyright 2014 by AxisofLogic.com

This material is available for republication as long as reprints include verbatim copy of the article in its entirety, respecting its integrity. Reprints must cite the author and Axis of Logic as the original source including a "live link" to the article. Thank you!


Printer friendly page Print This
If you appreciated this article, please consider making a donation to Axis of Logic. We do not use commercial advertising or corporate funding. We depend solely upon you, the reader, to continue providing quality news and opinion on world affairs.Donate here




World News
AxisofLogic.com© 2003-2014
Fair Use Notice  |   Axis Mission  |  About us  |   Letters/Articles to Editor  | Article Submissions |   Subscribe to Ezine   | RSS Feed  |