axis
Fair Use Notice
  Axis Mission
 About us
  Letters/Articles to Editor
Article Submissions
RSS Feed


Cuba-US: Both sides win. No they don't; yes they do. Printer friendly page Print This
By Paul Richard Harris, Axis of Logic
Axis of Logic
Friday, Dec 19, 2014

Regardless of who's commenting, it's clear that everyone was caught off guard by the December 18 announcement from Washington and Havana of a new era in relations between the US and Cuba. Both presidents took the opportunity to thank Canada for mediating the talks over the past 18 months or so - Canada being a reasonable choice since it is friends with both of them.

And while there are at least a few members of US Congress who have a problem with the agreement (and no doubt Raúl has similar gripes from his government), there is also wide ranging opinion about the value of the agreement and, more importantly, who won and who lost.

There are some in the US who characterize Obama as a sell-out and it will still take an act of Congress if the US embargo on Cuba is to be lifted. And there are those who believe the deal is a slap in the face to various others: to Russia; to ALBA; to Mercosur, and so on - a slap by Cuba.

Whatever reasons the two countries might have had for heading down this path at this time (or, rather, starting down it 18 months ago), it will surely take some time before it is clear whether either side gained or lost anything. In a small sampling of opinion, we can find Andrew Korybko writing in Oriental Review under the title, 'Did Raul Castro Just Reverse The Entire Cuban Revolution?'. Korybko writes:
Raul Castro may have potentially made a fatal mistake that risks destroying everything the Cuban Revolution built over the past half century. By entering into a deal with the US, he’s letting the wily Color Revolution fox into the hen house, and he’s also betraying his multipolar Russian ally at the same time.

Havana and Washington entered into a surprise deal yesterday to historically restore their relations after engaging in a high-profile prisoner swap. Nobody was expecting such a major development to occur, making many wonder how such an impactful decision could be kept under wraps for so long. The reason being was likely that the US understood what a major hemispheric power play this was and wanted to do everything to safeguard its secret strategy. On the contrary, Cuba, whether its leadership realizes it or not, has everything to lose, and it’s clear from the details that Washington was ‘negotiating’ from a position of strength. While Raul may have thought he could outmaneuver the imminent Color Revolution attempt that will occur after Fidel’s death, he may have actually committed a Yanukovich-esque tactical mistake by trying to enter into agreement with the same forces obsessed with his ouster.
...
But what is certain in this situation is that Raul is following in Yanukovich’s footsteps by trying to save his own skin through convoluted Machiavellian games. Fidel is a likely a lot closer to death than the Cuban government is letting on, and Raul knows that the moment his brother passes away, the Color Revolution will officially be initiated. He thought he could preempt large-scale disturbances among the portion of the population with legitimate grievances that could be manipulated by the US through a proactive deal with Washington. But just like Yanukovich committed a flagrant folly through his ‘reach out’ attempts to the ‘opposition’, so too is Raul doing the exact same thing by working with the US. The difference is, Yanukovich dealt with the proxies, but Raul is politicking with the puppet masters themselves, who are much more experienced at the art of manipulation than the throw-away ‘opposition’ is.
...
Cuba represents the symbol of the global anti-imperialist movement and its soft power is certainly disproportionate to its size (and rightfully so). Nonetheless, like many things in life, this massive advantage also has an equally negative disadvantage, in that if Cuba betrays its ideological foundation and allies with the US, then it would also be betraying its multipolar allies in the region, specifically Venezuela. In recent years, Caracas has succeeded Havana as the capital most actively resisting American dominance in the region, largely due to the astronomical economic benefits that come with its natural resources largesse, but the two states are still fraternal brothers in the cause, and Venezuela’s leaders are said to sometimes take their political cues from Cuba. But, if Cuba really did double deal against its allies and is now buddy-buddy with the US, then Venezuela would be the first country to be most directly affected by this political reorientation.
Meanwhile, Tom Hayden writes on his website 'Why the US-Cuba Deal Really Is a Victory for the Cuban Revolution'. According to Hayden:
No one in the mainstream media will acknowledge it, but the normalization of American relations with Havana, symbolized by release of prisoners today, is a huge success for the Cuban Revolution.

The hostile US policy, euphemistically known as “regime change,” has been thwarted. The Cuban Communist Party is confidently in power. The Castros have navigated through all the challenges of the years. In Latin America and the United Nations, Cuba is accepted, and the United States is isolated. 

It is quite legitimate for American progressives to criticize various flaws and failures of the Cuban Revolution. But the media and the right are overflowing with such commentary. Only the left can recall, narrate and applaud the long resistance of tiny Cuba to the northern Goliath.

For those actually supportive of participatory democracy in Cuba, as opposed to those who support regime change by secret programs, the way to greater openness on the island lies in a relaxation of the external threat.

Despite the US embargo and relentless US subversion, Cuba remains in the upper tier of the United Nations Human Development Index because of its educational and health care achievements. Cuba even leads the international community in the dispatch of medical workers to fight Ebola. Cuba is celebrated globally because of its military contribution to the defeat of colonialism and apartheid in Angola and southern Africa. Now a new generation of Cuban leaders who fought in Angola is coming to power in the Havana and its diplomatic corps. For example, Rodolfo Reyes Rodríguez, Cuba’s representative to the United Nations, today walks on an artificial limb as a result of his combat in Angola.
...
Going forward, the US will remove Cuba from the “state terrorism” listing, which will ease the possibility of funding from the international financial system. For American citizens, permission to travel to Cuba will be significantly widened. Business and trade possibilities will increase. Starting with the 2015 Summit of the Americas in Panama, the American and Cuban delegations will sit at the same table. The so-called interest sections will be upgraded to formal embassies. The embargo is going to be hollowed out from within, with American tourist and investment dollars permitted to flow. With or without Congressional action to lift the 1996 Helms-Burton act, the embargo is being dissolved. Over 400,000 Cuban-Americans traveled to Cuba last year alone. 

And here's a prediction: if the president has his wish, the Obama family will be seen on the streets of Havana before his term is up.
The likelihood is the outcome is going to be somewhere between the two extremes. Regardless, it would appear the 53-year embargo might be on its last legs. It's very difficult to see how the lifting of the embargo could be negative - for either side, or for anyone else.

While the US might still harbour dreams of being in empire-like control of ALL the Americas as they were in the past (possibly excepting Canada), this is not the same world as it was when the embargo was first enacted. The US no longer holds the entire world in the palms of its hands, and there are new rivals for them to face (Russia, BRICS, Russia-China, ALBA, a strong leftist component in Latin America - even their own floundering economy, and so on).

I'll be very surprised if Hayden proves correct about Obama walking the streets of Havana (at least as a sitting president). But I'm patient enough to wait and see.


Paul Richard Harris is an Axis of Logic editor and columnist, based in Canada. He can be reached at paul@axisoflogic.com.
 
Read the Biography and additional articles by Axis Columnist, Paul Richard Harris



© Copyright 2014 by AxisofLogic.com

This material is available for republication as long as reprints include verbatim copy of the article in its entirety, respecting its integrity. Reprints must cite the author and Axis of Logic as the original source including a "live link" to the article. Thank you!



Printer friendly page Print This
If you appreciated this article, please consider making a donation to Axis of Logic. We do not use commercial advertising or corporate funding. We depend solely upon you, the reader, to continue providing quality news and opinion on world affairs.Donate here




World News
AxisofLogic.com© 2003-2015
Fair Use Notice  |   Axis Mission  |  About us  |   Letters/Articles to Editor  | Article Submissions |   Subscribe to Ezine   | RSS Feed  |