Can the world wake up?
|Copyright The Nation|
On September 19, 2000, going on 16 years ago, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard of the London Telegraph reported:
“Declassified American government documents show that the US
intelligence community ran a campaign in the Fifties and Sixties to
build momentum for a united Europe. It funded and directed the European
“The documents confirm suspicions voiced at the time that America was
working aggressively behind the scenes to push Britain into a European
state. One memorandum, dated July 26, 1950, gives instructions for a
campaign to promote a fully fledged European parliament. It is signed by
Gen. William J. Donovan, head of the American wartime Office of
Strategic Services, precursor of the CIA.”
The documents show that the European Union was a creature of the CIA. (Telegraph.co.uk)
As I have previously written, Washington believes that it is easier to control one government,
the EU, than to control many separate European governments. As
Washington has a long term investment in orchestrating the European
Union, Washington is totally opposed to any country exiting the
arrangement. That is why President Obama recently went to London to
tell his lapdog, the British Prime Minister, that there could be no
Like other European nations, the British people were never allowed to
vote on whether they were in favor of their country ceasing to exist
and them becoming Europeans. British history would become the history of
a bygone people like the Romans and Babylonians.
The oppressive nature of unaccountable EU laws and regulations and
the EU requirement to accept massive numbers of third world immigrants
have created a popular demand for a British vote on whether to remain a
sovereign country or to dissolve and submit to Brussels and its
dictatorial edicts. The vote is scheduled for June 23.
Washington’s position is that the British people must not be
permitted to decide against the EU, because such a decision is not in
The prime minister’s job is to scare the British people with alleged
dire consequences of “going it alone.” The claim is that “little
England” cannot stand alone. The British people are being told that
isolation will spell their end, and their country will become a
backwater bypassed by progress. Everything great will happen elsewhere,
and they will be left out.
If the fear campaign does not succeed and the British vote to exit the EU, the open question is
whether Washington will permit the British government to accept the democratic outcome.
Alternatively, the British government will deceive the British
people, as it routinely does, and declare that Britain has negotiated
concessions from Brussels that dispose of the problems that concern the
Washington’s position shows that Washington is a firm believer that
only Washington’s interests are important. If other peoples wish to
retain national sovereignty, they are simply being selfish. Moreover,
they are out of compliance with Washington, which means they can be
declared a “threat to American national security.” The British people
are not to be permitted to make decisions that do not comply with
Washington’s interest. My prediction is that the British people will
either be deceived or overridden.
It is Washington’s self-centeredness, the self-absorption, the
extraordinary hubris and arrogance, that explains the orchestrated
“Russian threat.” Russia has not presented herself to the West as a
military threat. Yet, Washington is confronting Russia with a US/NATO
naval buildup in the Black Sea, a naval, troop and tank buildup in the Baltics and Poland, missile bases on Russia’s borders, and plans to incorporate the
former Russian provinces of Georgia and Ukraine in US defense pacts
When Washington, its generals and European vassals declare Russia to
be a threat, they mean that Russia has an independent foreign policy and
acts in her own interest rather than in Washington’s interest. Russia
is a threat, because Russia demonstrated the capability of blocking
Washington’s intended invasion of Syria and bombing of Iran. Russia
blunted one purpose of Washington’s coup in the Ukraine by peacefully
and democratically reuniting with Crimea, the site of Russia’s Black
Sea naval base and a Russian province for several centuries.
Perhaps you have wondered how it was possible for small countries
such as Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, and Venezuela to be threats to the US
superpower. On its face Washington’s claim is absurd. Do US
presidents, Pentagon officials, national security advisors, and chairmen
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff really regard countries of so little
capability as military threats to the United States and NATO countries?
No, they do not. The countries were declared threats, because they
have, or had prior to their destruction, independent foreign and
economic policies. Their policy independence means that they do not or
did not accept US hegemony. They were attacked in order to bring them
under US hegemony.
In Washington’s view, any country with an independent policy is outside Washington’s umbrella and, therefore, is a threat.
Venezuela became, in the words of US President Obama, an “unusual and
extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the
United States,” necessitating a “national emergency” to contain the
“Venezuelan threat” when the Venezuelan government put the interests of
the Venezuelan people above those of American corporations.
Russia became a threat when the Russian government demonstrated the
ability to block Washington’s intended military attacks on Syria and
Iran and when Washington’s coup in the Ukraine failed to deliver to
Washington the Russian Black Sea naval base.
Clearly Venezuela cannot possibly pose a military threat to the US,
so Venezuela cannot possibly pose an “unusual and extraordinary threat
to the national security of the US.” Venezuela is a “threat” because
the Venezuelan government does not comply with Washington’s orders.
It is absolutely certain that Russia has made no threats whatsoever
against the Baltics, Poland, Romania, Europe, or the United States. It
is absolutely certain that Russia has not invaded the Ukraine. How do
we know? If Russia had invaded Ukraine, the Ukraine would no longer be
there. It would again be a Russian province where until about 20 years
ago Ukraine resided for centuries, for longer than the US has existed.
Indeed, the Ukraine belongs in Russia more than Hawaii and the
deracinated and conquered southern states belong in the US.
Yet, these fantastic lies from the highest ranks of the US
government, from NATO, from Washington’s British lackeys, from the
bought-and-paid-for Western media, and from the bought-and-paid-for EU
are repeated endlessly as if they are God’s revealed truth.
Syria still exists because it is under Russian protection. That is
the only reason Syria still exists, and it is also another reason that
Washington wants Russia out of the way.
Do Russia and China realize their extreme danger? I don’t think even Iran realizes its ongoing danger despite its close call.
If Russia and China realize their danger, would the Russian
government permit one-fifth of its media to be foreign owned? Does
Russia understand that “foreign owned” means CIA owned? If not, why not?
If so, why does the Russian government permit its own destabilization
at the hands of Washington’s intelligence service acting through foreign
China is even more careless. There are 7,000 US-funded NGOs (non-governmental organizations) operating in China. Only last month did the Chinese government finally move, very
belatedly, to put some restrictions on these foreign agents who are
working to destabilize China. The members of these treasonous
organizations have not been arrested. They have merely been put under
police watch, an almost useless restriction as Washington can provide
endless money with which to bribe the Chinese police.
Why do Russia and China think that their police are less susceptible
to bribes than Mexico’s or American police? Despite the multi-decade
“war on drugs,” the drug flow from Mexico to the US is unimpeded.
Indeed, the police forces of both countries have a huge interest in the
“war on drugs” as the war brings them riches in the form of bribes.
Indeed, as the crucified reporter for the San Jose Mercury newspaper
proved many years ago, the CIA itself is in the drug-running business.
In the United States truth-tellers are persecuted and imprisoned, or
they are dismissed as “conspiracy theorists,” “anti-semites,” and
“domestic extremists.” The entire Western World consists of a dystopia
far worse than the one described by George Orwell in his famous book, 1984.
That Russia and China permit Washington to operate in their media, in
their universities, in their financial systems, and in “do-good” NGOs
that infiltrate every aspect of their societies demonstrates that both
governments have no interest in their survival as independent states.
They are too scared of being called “authoritarian” by the Western
presstitute media to protect their own independence.
My prediction is that Russia and China will soon be confronted with an unwelcome decision:
accept American hegemony or go to war.