Over the course of the past few months, the United States has pushed NATO to build up troops on Russia's border, held war games in its backyard, and deployed aircraft carriers to
the Mediterranean in order to send a message to Russia of what the US
is capable of. The rationale for such actions has always been very
vaguely communicated, but as NATO European Command General Philip
Breedlove said, it has all been to send a signal of deterrence to Russia.
Granted, over two years ago Russia annexed Crimea, however since that
time the turmoil in that area has been relatively quiet. The reality is
that, according to General Petr Pavel, chairman of the NATO Military
Committee, there is no intelligence that suggests Russia is planning any broad-scale aggression whatsoever.
According to General Pavel, NATO is not contemplating any further
troop build-up in Eastern Europe beyond what's already been done, and as
Reuters reports,
Pavel claims that the build-up was just in hopes of discouraging Russia
from orchestrating the kind of campaign it used to annex the Crimea
peninsula. However what Pavel said next is most interesting:
"Deployment
of substantial military force is not being considered. It is not the
aim of NATO to create a military barrier against broad-scale Russian
aggression, because such aggression is not on the agenda and no intelligence assessment suggests such a thing."
Well that's quite a statement,
because the actions of the US and NATO have completely contradicted that
assessment. If Pavel is correct, and there is no actual intelligence
that suggests any aggression is being planned by Russia, then either the
US is trying to provoke the country into action on purpose, which is
always a possibility, or another possibility is one that we pointed out last
week, and that is the Saudis are pressuring the US to get rid of
Assad. If the US accommodates that request from its good friend Saudi
Arabia, then a direct conflict with Russia would be imminent, as Russia
has made it very clear that the US isn't to take Assad out militarily. If
the US knows it is going to go ahead and topple Assad at the behest of
the Saudis, then it would make sense to have an already established
force surrounding Russia's border to deter any immediate action.
Source: Zero Hedge
|