axis
Fair Use Notice
  Axis Mission
 About us
  Letters/Articles to Editor
Article Submissions
RSS Feed


Sudan And South Sudan Need A Time Out, But Will The U.S. And China Comply? Printer friendly page Print This
By Dallas Darling
Submitted by Author
Wednesday, Sep 26, 2018

Straddling what many today call the Transition Zone, a volatile area along Africa’s north central region because of dramatic changes in both the human and physical landscape, Sudan and South Sudan have never had a time-out from colonialism or neocolonialism. Whether the Egyptian and British forces, or the current U.S. military forces and Chinese infrastructure tug-o-war over the African nation’s geo-proximity and oil rich region, how to best organize itself without interference was never an option. It still isn’t today.

No wonder fighting broke out again in South Sudan just two days after the warring sides signed another peace deal. Calling it a “final final” agreement to end the civil war, it faces a similar fate as that of the agreement in 2011 where South Sudan declared its independence. After centuries of ethnic and religious conflict, it didn’t last long. Neither was it free from interference as both the U.S. and China intervened with “carrot and stick” proposals. Meanwhile, China’s by far has gained the upper hand.

U.S.’s Military And CIA Interference Policy
As for the U.S., its finally courting Sudan with drone and military operations. This, after backing the Sudan People’s Liberation Army to overthrow the Khartoum government. Having declared Sudan a nation filled with shady arms deals, genocide and harboring terrorists like Osama Bin Laden, the U.S. is wants to militarily expand into the north while blocking China’s inroads. Given Sudan’s geo-proximity to Libya, Somalia, the Red Sea and Yemen, and Horn of Africa, its amazing the compromises the U.S. will commit.

It’s also amazing what the Pentagon will do. A series of meetings between AFRICOM and Sudanese officials have led to a new military attache and embassy in Khartoum. This includes a possible drone base. Calling it a “drone revolution,” AFRICOM has offered to provide medical and drought relief, combat desertification, and, of course, give military intelligence with its UAVs. Some warn however that the intelligence could worsen Sudan’s warring factions around oil rich regions straddling both Sudan and South Sudan.

There’s more. Washington wants to fight terrorism-Lord’s Resistance Army, deny safe haven to rebel factions in South Sudan, and improve humanitarian access to people in need. Spearheaded by the CIA, it too was keen to see sanctions lifted and to open its own office in Khartoum. It’s also obvious the U.S. wants to use both countries as leverage against China, and each other. This is especially true as it wrestles over the Heglig oil region and Heglig-Port Sudan oil pipeline that Sudan controls.

Beijing’s Pro-Economics And Noninterference Policy

For now, Beijing’s non-militarization and non-politicization of economic investments without any interference in Sudan’s internal affairs is paying off. Having ignored most Western-imposed sanctions against the African nation, it’s instead created another Silk Road as it did with North Korea’s Iron Silk Road. In other words, China believes human rights will follow if economic connectivity leads the way, such as food production, clean drinking water, roads and bridges, power grids and pipelines, and employment.

Because of this, the People’s Republic of China is Sudan’s biggest trade partner, importing oil from Sudan while exporting low cost items. This very robust and productive relationship has not only produced stability, but its enabled both countries to complete several major finance projects. The railway from Khartoum to Port Sudan, the Merowe Hydroelectric Dam, and small industries have greatly improved the lives of millions of Sudanese. So too has the Shandong Electric Power Construction Corporation.

China’s if-you-build-and-provide-it-there-will-be-peace-and-prosperity policy does have its critics. They point to China’s small arms exports to Sudan, along with the danger of some of them falling into the hands of rebel factions. Though these armaments hardly compare to the U.S.’s drones-over-Sudan-and-military-intervention policy, including AFRICOM’s vision for more military bases, some warn another war that could cost 2 million lives and displace 4 million is in the making. This is hardly what the nation needs.

Pandora’s Box Waiting To Open
Other problems exist as well. The human-made borders between South Sudan and Sudan are still disputed. There’s also ethnic fighting. This includes a deep division between Arabic-speaking Muslims who practice Islam in the north, and Christians and Animists who speak a variety of languages in the south. Racial discrimination between Sudanese Arabs and Black Sudanese farmers, and the oil pipeline which is controlled by Sudan and can charge large fees only adds to an already volatile situation.

It’s a volatile situation that can open Pandora’s Box if the U.S. military interferes and, that is, if China takes the bait. Indeed, China’s pro-economic and non-interference policy has paid off nicely. In fact, officials from both countries have a “look eastward to China” policy. This has even led Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir to say: We believe that the Chinese expansion was natural because it filled the space left by Western governments, the United States, and international funding agencies.”(1)

He added that, “The success of the Sudanese experiment in dealing with China without political conditions or pressures encouraged other African countries to look toward China.” Southern Sudanese hip-hop star Emmanuel Jal has also noted how positive Sudanese and Africans view China. Saying that China pays for what they want and sometimes doubles the amount, the only advice he’s ever heard them share was “Don’t go back to war.” It’s something that satisfies the Sudanese and makes them happy.(2)

Time-Out, At Least Militarily
Although everyone seems to have a one-word answer to the plight of Sudan and South Sudan-and other African nations-today, like “democracy,” “literacy,” “vaccines,” or “globalization,” China’s pro-economic and noninterference strategy seems to be winning the day. Still, Sudan and South Sudan won’t survive unless they attempt to respect the many tribal divisions and barriers. Toss into the mix the U.S.’s pro-military interference policy, and things look even worse. This includes sabotaging China’s many inroads.



Dallas Darling is the author of Politics 501: An A-Z Reading on Conscientious Political Thought and Action, Some Nations Above God: 52 Weekly Reflections On Modern-Day Imperialism, Militarism, And Consumerism in the Context of John’s Apocalyptic Vision, and The Other Side Of Christianity: Reflections on Faith, Politics, Spirituality, History, and Peace. He is a correspondent for www.WN.com. You can read more of Dallas’ writings at www.beverlydarling.com and  www.WN.com/dallasdarling.


(1) www.wikipedia.com. See article: “China-Sudan Relations,” Darfur Issue.
(2) www.wikipedia.com. See article: “China-Sudan Relations,” Non-Interference.



Printer friendly page Print This
If you appreciated this article, please consider making a donation to Axis of Logic. We do not use commercial advertising or corporate funding. We depend solely upon you, the reader, to continue providing quality news and opinion on world affairs.Donate here




World News
AxisofLogic.com© 2003-2015
Fair Use Notice  |   Axis Mission  |  About us  |   Letters/Articles to Editor  | Article Submissions |   Subscribe to Ezine   | RSS Feed  |