axis
Fair Use Notice
  Axis Mission
 About us
  Letters/Articles to Editor
Article Submissions
RSS Feed


Latest al-Qa'ida attack puts Saudi oil industry in question: Despite assurances, analysts are likely to be wary for some time to come Printer friendly page Print This
By Nicholas Pyke
The Independent
Sunday, May 30, 2004

 

It is only a few days since Prince Turki al-Faisal, the Saudi Ambassador to Britain, wrote an angry letter to The Independent. Terrorism, he insisted, poses no serious threat to the peace and security of the oil-rich kingdom despite the pessimistic tone of British media commentary.

Prince Turki will no doubt be putting pen to paper once again in the next few days.

Yesterday saw the second al-Qa'ida-backed raid on the kingdom's oil infrastructure within the space of a month, with 16 killed, including one Briton, and a further 50 oil workers taken hostage.

Despite the kingdom's repeated assurances, the episode will trouble analysts for some time to come.

Saudi Arabia is the leader of Opec (the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries), it is the world's biggest producer and it is sitting on a quarter of the globe's oil reserves. It is no exaggeration to say that the health of the global economy rests on the maintenance of supplies from this one Middle Eastern state.

The previous attack, which took place four weeks ago, may account for several dollars of the current price of a barrel of crude.

The Saudi Oil Minister, Ali al-Naimi, was due to meet Western oil executives yesterday to offer reassurance.

The world oil markets are already volatile, with prices hitting $41 (Ł22.35) a barrel in the past few weeks amid fears that a major attack could disrupt exports. The price has risen from $30 in just five months, tracking the escalation of violence in Iraq almost exactly.

According to Professor Andrew Oswald of Warwick University, oil prices at $50 a barrel would produce a world recession - although even this would not match the soaring prices of the 1970s.

External pressures are coming from the booming economies of China and India - currently building the world's longest single highway - which in the long term will upset global oil mathematics with the strength of their demand for crude.

But there are also domestic concerns. Mai Yamani, an expert on Saudi Arabia at the Royal Institute of International Affairs, says that political tension, rising violence and divisions among the princes of the ruling House of Saud, means that the country is in "chaos".

"Certainly the violence is going to increase ... It is the beginning of the end [for the regime]," Dr Yamani said.

The threat posed by rising levels of violence in the Middle East, and in Saudi Arabia in particular, are preoccupying analysts.

Yesterday's attack comes almost exactly a month after six people, including two Britons, were killed in a gun attack on a Saudi oil refinery in the Red Sea coast town of Yanbu.

This prompted the US ambassador to Saudi Arabia, James Oberwetter, to urge American citizens to leave the country. Of the many them did so, a good number were essential workers in the oil industry.

Fighters linked to or inspired by al-Qa'ida have been accused of a succession of attacks against government and foreign interests in the kingdom, including the suicide-bombing of a residential compound for Westerners in the capital, Riyadh, which took place in May last year and killed 34 people.

In Khobar, close to Bahrain, a building full of American soldiers was blown up in 1996. The atrocity, which killed 19 people, was blamed on al-Qa'ida.

Robert Baer, a former CIA officer, is convinced that the kingdom's vast oil infrastructure is vulnerable, and with it the Western economy.

In his recent book, Sleeping with the Devil, he writes that "taking down Saudi Arabia's oil infrastructure is like spearing fish in a barrel".

The kingdom has five giant fields connected by 10,500 miles of pipe work, most of it above ground. According to Mr Baer, a co-ordinated assault on five or more key junctions in the system could put the Saudis out of the oil business for two years.

A successful assault on the giant Ras Tanura complex "would be enough to bring the world's oil-addicted economies to their knees, America's along with them," he writes.

Jane's Intelligence Review has reported that over the past two years, the Saudi government has allocated an extra $750m to enhance security at all of its oil facilities as the risk of attack has increased.

At any one time, there are up to 30,000 guards protecting the kingdom's network. Anti-aircraft installations are also based at major locations to provide added defence.

Oil has been a mainstay of the Saudi economy since it was discovered in 1938, and production began under the then US-controlled and now nationalised Saudi Aramco (the Arabian American Oil Company).

Opec has played a significant role in maintaining oil market stability over the last few years, but the part played by Saudi Arabia has been crucial; the kingdom is the only country with sufficient capacity to increase production and bring down world oil prices.

Professor Oswald at Warwick believes the West had become complacent about the role played by oil in economic booms and busts, with too many prepared to discount its impact in a modern world. This is a lesson that may well need re-learning - the hard way.

 

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=526361

Printer friendly page Print This
If you appreciated this article, please consider making a donation to Axis of Logic. We do not use commercial advertising or corporate funding. We depend solely upon you, the reader, to continue providing quality news and opinion on world affairs.Donate here




World News
AxisofLogic.com© 2003-2015
Fair Use Notice  |   Axis Mission  |  About us  |   Letters/Articles to Editor  | Article Submissions |   Subscribe to Ezine   | RSS Feed  |