 |
| Battling pollution has been one of the biggest headaches for games organisers |
(Al Jazeera) - Beijing's Avenue of Eternal Peace runs straight as an arrow past
Tiananmen Square through the heart of China's capital. It is not
unusual for the smog to be so thick that anything more than 100 metres
along the street in either direction is lost in a suffocating haze.
But when the city, one of the world's most polluted, first bid for
the 2008 Olympics, it made a commitment to host a "green games".
Almost a decade later, most environmentalists agree that a raft of
emergency measures will probably enable Beijing to pull off the
much-promised 'blue sky' Olympics.
But there are mixed opinions about the long-term outlook.
 |
| Hundreds of factories around the city have been ordered to close [GALLO/GETTY] |
Wen Bo, China director of NGO Pacific Environment, says there is little
doubt measures such as reducing the number of cars on the street,
shutting down factories and halting construction work will all have "an
immediate effect on the air quality".
But once the games have been and gone, Wen fears it will be a case of back to business as normal.
"The bad air will come back after the games are finished," he says.
Pollution may even worsen after the Olympics are over, Wen believes,
as construction firms and factories rush to make up for time lost lying
idle while the games are in progress.
The restrictions, which run from July 20 until September 20, include
barring private vehicles from entering the city on alternate days
depending on their licence plate, as well as work stoppages at
construction sites, chemical plants and factories around the capital.
Shutdown
A particular boost is expected to come from the closure of Beijing's biggest single polluter, Capital Steel.
The giant metal works, just 17km from Tiananmen Square, has
shuttered most of its steel mills and blast furnaces, cutting output by
70 per cent, according to state media.
But take away the possibly temporary effect of these emergency
measures, some environmentalists say, and there is little evidence that
Beijing has significantly tackled its pollution problem.
In a recently-released report in the final run up to the games,
Greenpeace China gave an - at best - mixed assessment of Beijing's
environmental efforts.
The environmental group said that while some important measures had
been introduced to conserve water and energy, air pollution –
especially that caused by tiny particulate matter, known as PM10 –
remains a problem.
The report said it was significant that despite the introduction of
such long-term measures, the pollution remained bad enough that Beijing
had been forced to also adopt the temporary restrictions on vehicles
and industry.
 |
| Chinese officials have pledged to ensure 'blue skies' during the games [Reuters] |
"Beijing could have adopted clean production measures more widely
across the municipality to speed up the improvement of air quality and
to ensure that standards are met for the whole year," Greenpeace said.
Nonetheless the group conceded that China has made impressive progress on several fronts.
"To the surprise of many western journalists, we would say the
government is 95 per cent on track with their targets," Lo Sze Ping,
Greenpeace's campaign director, said pointing to the amount of money
pledged to improving the city's environment, including tightening
vehicle emissions for cars and building four new subway lines.
However Lo said Greenpeace was concerned that Beijing authorities
had missed opportunities to use the games to introduce more ambitious
environmental protection measures.
Cancelled out
A particular cause of concern, he said, was continued high levels of
PM10 particulates - believed to be connected to increased risks of
heart and lung diseases, including cancer.
As a result, Lo said, sports teams participating in the games "have reason to be concerned".
The problem, says Pacific Environment's Wen Bo, is that the positive
changes have literally been cancelled out by an explosion in the number
of new vehicles on the roads, the hectic pace of construction, and the
growing number of people and businesses in the city.
Steven Q Andrews, an independent environmental consultant, is even more scathing.
|
"When
there is no watchdog the government can do pretty much what it wants,
and it has done a great job of silencing environmental groups"
Wen Bo, Pacific Environment
|
"Last year, not a single day during the Olympic period met the agreed
upon World Health Organisation guidelines for air quality," he says.
"Through July 21, I believe there has only been two days that have
met the WHO guidelines. But the efforts to improve air quality are
being heralded by the Chinese government as a success."
So where did the government go wrong?
Environmentalists say the main problem is that there is nobody to keep tabs on the government.
"When there is no watchdog the government can do pretty much what it
wants, and it has done a great job of silencing environmental groups,"
says Wen.
The government, he says, needs to encourage a free press and a civil
society to monitor and put pressure on local governments and to
encourage the public to support greener lifestyles.
Citizen power
"They have been relying on technological fixes – and they have put a
lot of money into this - to get the environment clean, but they didn't
realise citizen power is very important to safeguarding Beijing's
environment."
Corruption has been a huge problem in getting factories to operate under guidelines, he adds.
 |
| Tight restrictions on car use aim to minimise traffic pollution [AFP] |
Greenpeace too says that the Beijing games organisers did not give it
"sufficient access to important information regarding Beijing's
environmental progress," making it difficult "to accurately gauge how
successful Beijing's environmental initiatives have been".
Andrews says the biggest problem is that China's public do not know
the truth as local governments, under pressure to deliver good
environmental records, doctor figures.
He says authorities have fiddled with official standards and moved
air quality monitoring stations to make Beijing's pollution look less
serious.
The most serious pollutant, ozone, is not even officially measured, Andrews says.
"I hope the air quality will improve after the Olympics, but since
it hasn't improved in the build up to the Olympics, I am not
optimistic," he says.
"For the air quality to improve there needs to be transparent reporting of this environmental crisis."
(link to source)