
MAS Supporters celebrate (Amaru Goyes)
Cochabamba, Bolivia (Upside Down World) - On
August 10, leftist President Evo Morales, of the Movement Towards
Socialism (MAS) party, won a resounding victory in Bolivia’s recall
referendum. With 96.1 percent of polling tables counted, the National
Electoral Court reports 67.77 percent support for Morales nation-wide.
The
recall referendum also put eight of Bolivia’s nine departmental
prefects (governors) to popular vote. Two conservative prefects,
Manfred Reyes Villa of Cochabamba and José Luis Paredes of La Paz were
revoked by wide margins.
Regardless
of what happens next, the vote invigorated Morales’ mandate in what was
a broad endorsement from his base and beyond. As Toribio Terrazas, a
farmer from outside Comunidad Mamenaca explained, "We don't know why
they want to revoke the president. I understand it like it's something
discriminatory. An indigenous president has come to power, as never
before, and the old governments weren't like him. And it's clear that
an indigenous president doesn't steal money and doesn't sell off his
country. This must be their motive. I want the president to continue
because he is forging a good path for all Bolivians in the country."
On the Road to the Recall Vote
The
recall referendum rose out of the conflicts between two essentially
distinct political visions for Bolivia’s future. Generally speaking,
the first is the "process of change," led by President Morales and the
social movements that paved the way to his election. The second is the
"autonomy movement," led by conservative prefects and backed primarily
by powerful business and agrarian interests in Bolivia’s lowlands, who
want to maintain the old balance of economic and political power.
The
"process of change" refers to the recent struggles initiated throughout
history by different social organizations to affect deep structural
changes in Bolivian society. These struggles yielded an agenda across
different sectors including popular sovereignty over natural resources
(such as gas, oil, water, minerals), popular participation in
government, agrarian reform, and a constituent assembly to "re-found"
the country with participation of poor and indigenous people.
President
Morales was elected in 2005 with 53.74 percent of the vote
(historically high by Bolivian standards) based in part on his
commitment to put this agenda into effect nation wide. Gaining
momentum shortly after Morales’ election, a right-wing regionalist
"autonomy" movement rose in response to the broad MAS agenda,
concentrated in Bolivia’s wealthier, lighter-skinned populations in the
lowlands, and which now represents the heart of the opposition to the
Morales government. The autonomy movement calls for the
decentralization of the government bureaucracy based in La Paz and
increased power for departmental governments, primarily to manage local
resources and government. In 2006, the four lowland departments – Santa
Cruz, Beni, Pando and Tarija – voted in favor of departmental autonomy
in a national referendum. Unfortunately, many militants of departmental
autonomy couple these demands with racism toward indigenous people.
The
leadership of the autonomy movement principally comes from the prefects
in the lowland departments and their respective Civic
Committees–powerful organizations that represent landed and
pro-business interests. For these elites, departmental autonomy goes
beyond decentralization. It represents a mechanism for them to maintain
their economic power – particularly Santa Cruz’s extremely unequal
distribution of land – in the face of President Morales’ reforms.
The Battle for Cochabamba
Cochabamba
is the tipping point between the political force of Bolivia’s lowlands
and the political force of the Andean highlands. It has come to be the
department that defines the difference between one block and the other. - Rafael Puente, MAS’ Presidential Representative in Cochabamba
Bolivia’s
centrally located Department of Cochabamba is one of the battlegrounds
where these two conflicting political projects have played out – on
January 11, 2007 with violence and on August 10, 2008 at the ballot
box. Given the strategic nature of the department, Upside Down World’s recall referendum team decided to focus its coverage in Cochabamba.
As
indicated by Rafael Puente, geographically and politically Cochabamba
lies between La Paz and Santa Cruz. Politically, Evo Morales rose to
national prominence as a leader of the coca-growers union in
Cochabamba’s tropical Chapare region and MAS counts on the strong
support of the rural population. (The autonomy movement did not
initially have strong roots in Cochabamba – the department voted 62
percent "NO" in the 2006 national referendum on departmental autonomy.)
On
the other hand, in 2005, the department elected Manfred Reyes Villa, a
conservative former-mayor of the city of Cochabamba, for prefect. In
his campaign for prefect, Manfred ran on his reputation as an efficient
public servant and did not take a strong position on departmental
autonomy. Only after Bolivia’s constituent assembly had erupted in
conflict, and the debate over autonomy rose to new polemic heights in
December 2006, did Manfred throw his weight behind the autonomy
movement.
On
December 14, 2006 Reyes Villa announced his supported for departmental
autonomy and urged Santa Cruz to "go onwards with their independence."
Manfred’s pronouncement infuriated MAS-backers, particularly the
irrigators, coca-growers, and small farmers’ peasant union federations,
who demanded his resignation and took to the streets. Conflicts soon
spiraled out of control: radical supporters of MAS burnt down the
prefects office, groups of middle class youth organized to violently
force the campesinos out of "their city," and ultimately, on the on
January 11, two campesinos and one middle-class youth were killed.
In
this conflictive situation, Manfred suggested a recall referendum to
revoke President Morales’ mandate. MAS in turn proposed a law that
would allow for citizens to convoke a recall election for the
president, prefects, and mayors if they solicited enough voter
signatures. Yet, the conflicts in Cochabamba never reached a
resolution. Congress never made progress on a law to legalize recall
referendums and the subject disappeared from the political radar.
Manfred remained prefect and from that point forward he would be in
lock step with the lowland prefects in their demands and criticisms of
the central government.
The Recall Referendum’s Strange Political Journey
The
recall referendum rose out of the incredibly conflictive situation
surrounding the approval of the final draft of Bolivia’s yet-to-be new
constitution in November 2007, which left three anti-government
protesters dead. The opposition prefects began the call for a recall
referendum, as a remedy to what they believed was MAS’ authoritarian
conduct in the constituent assembly. In early December, all four
lowland prefects and Manfred Reyes Villa traveled to the United States
in part to seek backing for their proposal to hold a referendum.
In
response, the government quickly drew up a proposed law convoking a
recall referendum for the president and the prefects, which quickly
passed through the MAS-controlled Chamber of Deputies. The law was
clearly favorable towards MAS: in order for the president and
vice-president to be revoked, the "NO" vote against them would have to
supercede the percentage of support cast in their favor in the general
election of 2005. Concretely, this means that the vote against
president Morales would have to reach around 54 percent for his to be
revoked.

Toribio Terrazas (Photo: Amaru Goyes)
The
same rule – that the "NO" vote in the referendum needed to supercede
the "YES" vote in the 2005 elections – would apply in the case of the
prefects, which again would work in MAS’s favor since no prefect took
office with more than 48 percent support. To use to most stark example,
José Luis Paredes, prefect of La Paz and member of Podemos the
principal party of the opposition, had a meager 36 percent support in
the 2005 election but won the prefect’s office because the rest of the
votes were split between so many other political parties. In the recall
referendum under MAS’ proposed law, Paredes would have to receive 64
percent approval in the vote to continue as prefect.
Clearly
MAS knew that the opposition controlled Senate would either modify or
reject the proposed law. More likely the political logic was to take
initiative away from the opposition. After several weeks, the recall
referendum dropped off the political horizon and the bill lay dormant
in the Senate.
Then
in an utterly bizarre turn of events, on May 8 Podemos revived MAS’
recall referendum bill and passed it without modifying a single
article. Podemos’ approval of the recall referendum came on the heels
of the Department of Santa Cruz’s ratification of a set of "Autonomy
Statutes" in a vote that the National Electoral Court and the central
government qualified illegal.
With
the nation’s attention focus on Santa Cruz and the fallout from the
vote on the Autonomy Statutes, the opposition-led Senate’s approval of
the long-forgotten recall referendum came as a complete shock. Podemos’
support for the recall referendum left the opposition prefects, who
apparently had not been previously consulted, completely befuddled.
On
June 23 the opposition prefects issued a joint statement that the
recall referendum was unconstitutional and that they would refuse to
accept its legitimacy. However, a little over a week later, the four
prefects from the lowlands decided to begrudgingly accept the
referendum. Manfred Reyes Villa maintained the position that he would
refuse to recognize the results of the referendum, which he argued
would go against Bolivia’s constitution.
Despite
the majority of the prefects’ acquiescence, debate over the legality of
the plebiscite continued unabated, particularly regarding the way the
percentages favored the president and worked against the prefects. At
the end of July, the Departmental Electoral Courts based in the
lowlands threatened to not carry out the referendum in their
departments.
At
this time, the National Electoral Court held a 13-hour emergency
meeting with its departmental counterparts eventually working out a
political compromise, albeit one which may have involved the Court
infringing on the powers of Congress. The compromise set the
percentages which the prefects needed to reach for their ratification
at 50 percent, placating the lowland electoral courts and insuring that
the recall referendum went forward.
In
the week before the recall referendum, we interviewed number of
political and social movement leaders about the importance of the
referendum, the changes it might produce, and what they thought about
President Evo Morales and prefect Manfred Reyes Villa.

Jose Maria Leyes (Photo: Teresa Carrasco)
What do you see as the significance of the upcoming Recall referendum?
JOSEMARIA
LEYES is a lawyer and longtime member of the Cochabamba-based "Youth
for Democracy" group, which he told us seeks to teach young people
about the value of democracy, the rule of law, and liberty. The group
is criticized by social movement organizations for their role in
violence against campesinos in January 2007. Josemaria also organized
the collection of signatures in favor of holding another referendum on
departmental autonomy.
The
referendum as a legal, political and social instrument of consultation
with the people is positive because it strengthens the democratic
processes of any country.
As long as there is a greater social participation in any kind of decision-making, democracy is being refined and perfected.
In
Bolivia, unfortunately, the recall referendum has been distorted,
because it has lost the sense of democracy and social participation and
it has turned into a political tool to eliminate political opponents.
The people are being used to destroy [MAS’] political opponents.
RAFAEL
PUENTE is a former Jesuit priest and served as a Deputy in Bolivia’s
congress from 1985-89 for the United Left party. He is now MAS’
Presidential Representative in Cochabamba.

Rafael Puentes (Photo: Alex van Schaick)
To
begin, conceptually I think that the recall referendum is an advance in
the democratic system. To ask a people if a president who has completed
half his term should remain in office or not seems to me to be an
excellent democratic advance. During previous governments, it would
have been very interesting if they had asked us if we wanted the
government to leave.
In
general it’s a tendency of this government, which is expressed in the
new draft constitution, to give more decision-making capacity directly
to the population. I think that this is advancing from a representative
democracy – which is what we have had until now in that the people
delegated decisions to their representatives in parliament and these
representatives could do whatever they wanted with the people’s mandate
– to a democracy that isn’t representative but is much more
participatory and direct in that it’s in the population’s hands to
define the agenda.
-
BERNARDO GUTIERREZ is a lawyer and works in the prefect’s office as an advisor to Manfred Reyes Villa.
We
have spoken on many occations to the country about the risks that the
realization of this Recall Referendum imply, at least in the situation
and conditions in which it it is being carried forward.

Bernardo Guitierrez (Photo: Teresa Carrasco)
The
law which approved the Recall Referendum is a law that by any standard
is inconstitutional because it doesn’t establish equal rules for
determining who should be revoked. The president can pass his test to
remain in power with 47 percent support of the population, while the
prefect of Cochabamba would need 53 percent, more than half. There is
an inversion of demecratic principles; in this case the minority
governs.
LUCIANO
SANCHEZ is Secretary of Press and Propaganda for the agrarian union
federation, the Federación Sindical Única de Trabajadores Campesinos de
Cochabamba (FSUTCC).
For
us, the FSUTCC, the recall referendum is really important because it
deepens democracy. We have lived many years in dictatorship. Later,
thanks to the struggles of the organizations that sought democracy, we
gained Bolivia’s democracy. We lived in it for the last 20 years, but
in representative democracy, not a democracy that’s really
participative. In these years we lived through governments that we
elected but that did whatever they wanted. In this democracy the people
only govern one day (election day).
So
we want to deepen Bolivia’s democracy. That’s why we have so many
obstacles in our path. That’s why it’s very tense in our country. There
is a group that governed us with representative democracy and don’t
want participatory democracy. And now, these people are desperately
trying to make chaos in the country. They are trying to create
confrontation between Bolivians.
And
where did this participatory democracy begin? It begun with social
organizations – we have struggled for years upon years and thanks to
that struggle we have an indigenous president of Bolivia, of
Aymara-Quechua blood, for the first time in history.
And
now this bothers that other group – the conservatives – that wants to
maintain its privileges and keep itself in power. But now its not like
it was. For this reason the conservatives are fighting. So, there have
been in our country two different Bolivias. One that has lived in
abundance. The other in suffering. Against this, we have fought and now
we don’t want two Bolivias but we want one single Bolivia. But this
conservative group wants to maintain the two Bolivias. They, when they
were in power monopolized the land, the economy and political issues.
They had all the power and the people didn’t have any power. Now we
want the reverse – that the people have the power.
What changes might the referendum produce?
Rafael Puente:
One
of the arguments that are made is that the Recall Referendum isn’t
going to resolve anything. And that has been converted into some sort
of slogan that has reoccurred in all the newspapers. But no single
political action in itself resolves the problems that we face, but
rather they are resolved by a determined government in a series of
actions.
That is the only way to understand politics, and not that a single action can resolve everything.
It’s
inarguable that the Referendum won’t resolve anything by itself, but it
will prove a fundamental element of the political process that we are
living through, which is to clarify where the political forces are
really situated in the country. And this is fundamental.
It’s
not the same to have a president that doesn’t enjoy majority support of
the population and whose decisions moreover can be questioned due to a
lack of legitimacy, with the suspicion that this president isn’t
representing the majority of the population, because the majority
doesn’t agree with him. That’s not the same as having a president that
obviously continues to have the majority support of the population. We
have gone for two and a half years following Evo Morales’ line which
since he entered the presidency has been unwavering even if there have
been some errors and inconsistencies. This line is the recuperation of
sovereignty, natural resource, and greater democratic participation by
the population.
So
its very significant at the end of two and a half years to know that
this majority support for Evo continues, after he has shown what his
political line is. So politically it’s important to verify at the end
of these two and a half years, that the population continues to support
that line.
Second
of all, the political opposition to the government now isn’t expressed
by the opposition parties but rather by the prefects’ offices and the
civil committees. The advantage for the prefects is that they have
electoral legitimacy, since they were elected by the population in each
department. So it’s also important to know to what point does this
opposition block have the political strength that they apparently have.
Bernardo Gutierrez:
It’s
going to bring more polarization and division in the country. The
Referendum results may artificially strengthen the positions of each
side. This is preoccupying because it will seem like the Bolivian
people are debating amongst ourselves whether we want to declare war on
each other.
Why do (or don’t) you support President Evo Morales and Prefect Manfred Reyes Villa?

Don Federico and his family (Photo: Alex van Schaick)
DON
FEDERICO is President of the Organización Territorial de Base, a
sub-municipal administrative unit, in Villa Mexico, a poor migrant
neighborhood in Cochabamba’s impoverished southern zone. He is also
President of the local retired peoples’ association. He is 67 years old
and was born in an indigenous-campesino family in the North of Potosí.
He worked as a miner in Oruro in the mid 70s, an experience that he
called his "school" of class consciousness and inspired to become a
socialist militant.
This
government is doing what no government has done before. It’s been two
and a half years, and they have eliminated our national debt that
previous governments had. It’s gone down a ton. Now, the opportunities,
the benefits, for the people: education is a top priority, health is a
top priority. When have we the campesinos had the right to healthcare,
when have we had free health clinics? With what government? What
government has been preoccupied with education for people from rural
areas? The Juancito Pinto bonus is a great help for the campesinos.
With 200 bolivianos (roughly $30), you can buy your school material.
Jose Maria Leyes:
During
his term in office as Prefect (governor), the main mistake of Manfred
Reyes Villa was to not have supported autonomy since the beginning.
The
national referendum on autonomy was being planned at the same time as
the elections for prefect. During his candidacy as prefect he decided
not to embrace autonomy fearing it could cost him some votes. It was
just in the last week of the campaign that he spoke out and tried to
sell the autonomy issue. But it wasn’t enough and the "No" vote against
autonomy won in Cochabamba.
Manfred,
after governing as prefect for a while, tried to push for autonomy.
Precisely because he held a demonstration in December of 2006 in favour
of autonomy and decided to start the process of gathering signatures
for a new referendum on autonomy, these campesinos and coca-growers
came and took over the city, burnt down the prefect’s office and the
whole conflict blew up. And so Manfred’s mistake as prefect was to have
not stood for autonomy since the beginning.

Flor Cordoba (Photo: Alex van Schaick)
The 10 of August: Cochabamba Goes with Evo
By
all measures, August 10 affirms that the Department of Cochabamba can
no longer be said to hang in the balance, but rather is firmly behind
President Evo Morales and the process of change he seeks to carry
forward. With the final results in from the National Electoral Court,
the people of Cochabamba ratified Evo Morales with 71 percent support.
The
vote in Cochabamba breaks down along predictable lines: Morales won the
rural vote with 91 percent support and lost the city of Cochabamba with
45 percent, according to a ATB/La Razon exit poll, confirming that a
rural/urban divide exists in perceptions of the president.
Yet
there were a few surprises: Morales won the department-wide urban vote
with 53 percent signaling that he has significant support in urban
areas outside of the city of Cochabamba.
Also,
speculation existed in the media that Morales’ support might fall in
the Department of Cochabamba due to the middle class, which is
increasingly alienated from the President’s political project.
Comparing the statistics from the 2005 election to the ATB/La Razon
exit poll confirms that Morales’ support indeed dropped from 52 percent
to 45 percent in the city of Cochabamba. But few thought that MAS
consolidated their rural base to the extent that Morales’ popularity
would actually rise from 65 percent in 2005 to 71 percent in 2008.
The
results delivered a huge blow to prefect Manfred Reyes Villa and his
hopes for a future presidential run. His 35 percent support essentially
boils down to a modest amount of backing in the city of Cochabamba’s
center and north zones facing a complete rejection in the rest of the
city and department.
The
August 10 vote also indicates that the autonomy movement in Cochabamba,
on which Reyes Villa gambled his political future, is an urban, middle
class phenomenon.
The Increasingly Isolated Autonomy Movement
Although
the Recall referendum nationally will not resolve the political impasse
between what are essentially Bolivia’s two competing political
projects, the results should give pause to the leadership of the
autonomy movement in the lowlands.
Though
few expected President Evo Morales to lose the referendum, his
astounding 67 percent support nationally was quite a surprise. Breaking
down the results, Morales swept the highland winning by 85 percent in
Potosí and 83 percent in Oruro and La Paz.
In
the valley region, he won Cochabamba with 71 percent and Chuquisaca
with 54 percent. Morales’ victory in Chuquisaca comes as a surprise
given MAS just lost a special election for prefect there a month ago.
In
the pro-autonomy lowlands Morales received more surprising results. He
won a majority of 52.5 percent in Pando and lost with 49.87 percent, a
mere 427 votes, in the gas rich Department of Tarija. In Beni and Santa
Cruz he lost with 44 percent and 39 percent respectively. Such high
percentages of "YES" votes for Evo are shocking when compared to the
level of support MAS garnered in the four departments during the
general elections of 2005, in which MAS won 23 percent in Pando, 32
percent in Tarija, 16.5 percent in Beni, and 33 percent in Santa Cruz.
The
results, as suggested by Rafael Puente, do give us interesting insights
into the balance of forces between the process of change and the
autonomy movement. Evo Morales has constructed a serious following
nationally, even in the lowlands.
Morales
has fortified his bases in rural areas to an incredible degree – 85
percent support in rural areas nationwide according to ATB/La Razon’s
exit poll. He has built this support on his personal ethnic and class
background, his tight relationship with Bolivia’s strong rural
organizations, and a mix of implementing policies to support the
countryside and personally delivering development projects from the
state and other allies in Latin America to even the most remote
communities at an astounding pace. This support in rural areas hold
true in the lowlands, where the autonomy movement has been unable to
make major headway with highland migrants or lowland indigenous people.
Morales
also counts on strong support in the poor and migrant neighborhoods in
all of Bolivia’s major cities, as well as many urban unions and
progressive organizations.
All
this added together, the opposition has been virtually isolated to the
urban, non-indigenous population, with the exception of some support in
semi-urban and rural areas in the lowlands.
Yet
President Morales’s high support will most likely not translate into
less resistance from the lowland prefects, who received high levels of
support in the referendum. Ruben Costas, prefect of Santa Cruz, on the
night of August 10, announced in a distinctly not conciliatory speech
that his ratification with 67 percent of the vote signified a victory
for autonomy and a blow to MAS. He delivered the speach in a strange
voice that bordered on a growl, declaring that the "insensible,
totalitarian, MASista, incapable government negates the development of
the people and only seeks to concentrate power and convert us into its
pawns."
The
Morales government has indicated their desire to harmonize the
departments’ demands for autonomy with the draft constitution and
convened dialogue with the ratified prefects, which began last night
missing only Ruben Costas of Santa Cruz. Yet, such a negotiated
solution to the two clashing visions of Bolivia’s future seems
far-fetched. While dialogue may resolve some points of contention, the
interests that lie behind the lowland prefects – particularly to
protect large landholders from agrarian reform – will slow any
negotiated resolution to the conflict from being reached.

Morning voting in Villa Pagador (Photo: Amaru Goyes)
More Voices from Bolivia’s August 10 Recall Referendum
During the recall referendum on August 10, we went around Cochabamba to talk with voters. Here is what they had to say.
7:30AM – Villa Pagador
In
the migrant neighborhood, the streets are bustling with activity on
Sunday morning, referendum day. There are no cars though – in Bolivia
no vehicular transportation, public or private, is permitted on
Election Day except for those with a special permit. All voters are
required to go to their polls at their neighborhood school.
We
drink cups of "Api," a warm and sweet corn beverage made from different
varieties of corn, as we wait for the polls to open at 8:00. Our driver
for the day, Margarita, explains that many of Villa Pagador’s
residents, such as herself, migrated from the highlands, particularly
from Oruro. Margarita is a "taxi-trufi" driver (a taxi that picks up
multiple passengers along a fixed route) and militantly pro-MAS. She
wanted to take us to Villa Pagador before going outside the city
because there was no way she was going to risk not casting her ballot.

Raymunda Garcia Ramirez
San Francisco Educational Unit voting precinct
Reymunda Garcia Ramirez and her husband Esteban Bonifacio:
Reymunda
Yes,
I support the government because it’s doing a good job. Not like the
other governments like [Jorge "Tuto" Quiroga] or [Gonzalo "Goni"
Sanchéz de Lozada]. Look at what they have done. How could they have
sold all of Bolivia?
Esteban
My motives for participating in the Recall Referendum are that we want to change our
authority in the prefect’s office because Manfred Reyes Villa hasn’t
valued the mandate of the people of Cochabamba. We said no to autonomy,
but of course he tried to do it anyways. As an authority, what the
people decide must be followed.
At
the national level, I look at the prefect’s offices that are now
against Morales, they are prefects that are looking after their
personal interests. The autonomy that they are dictating only serves to
make them bosses of the city. I don’t like that either. I want a
president or a prefect from the people – not one serving a small group
of people or personal interests.

Elena Gareca Vargas (Photo:Alex van Schaick)
10:30AM – Comunidad Mamenaca
We
wanted to get a feel for how the rural vote was going, so we headed to
Tarata, a beautifully colonial town of several thousand people an hour
outside of Cochabamba. As we were on the road, we picked up a
handicapped farmer who flagged us down for a ride. In the countryside,
as there is no transportation on Election Day, farmers have to walk
long distances to reach their nearest polling precinct. We dropped him
off at the Community of Mamenaca, a town before Tarata. We took the
time to interview him and some other people congregated outside the
polls.
Toribio Terrazas
We
don’t know why they want to revoke the president. I understand it like
its something discriminatory. An indigenous president has come to
power, as never before, and the old governments weren’t like him. And
it’s clear that an indigenous president doesn’t steal money and doesn’t
sell off his country. This must be their motive. I want the president
to continue because it’s a good path he is forging for all Bolivians in
the country.

Campesinos after voting in Huertamayu (Photo: Amaru Goyes)
Elena Gareca Vargas
I
would like to say that I live in the city, but I just have a little
house out here and I came to vote. I can’t lie, I’m a fanatic of MAS.
And I can’t lie about Manfred either, we don’t support him here. Why?
Because he has done so many illegal things. Because of all the riches
he has. Why wouldn’t we support the government? Why would we support
Bombon (Reyes Villa’s nickname)? We have to support our people from the
countryside. I support Evo because he an upstanding man. The things he
does are transparent. Who wouldn’t want that? Above all it’s for the
poor people… For example, my mother is very old. Maybe tomorrow I could
die. Who is going to give her something to eat? It’s Evo. Now there’s
Juancito Pinto Bonus [The government now gives 200 Bolivianos or $30 to
students in elementary school after successfully completing a grade]
for the children. What government took care of such things? Not one but
Evo. That’s why I support him with pleasure and all the pride in my
heart.

Andres Cruz Martes (Photo: Alex van Schaick)
1:30PM – Comunidad Huertamayu
After
passing through Tarata, we headed to the community of Huertamayu, ten
kilometers of dirt road outside of Tarata. Huertamayu, with a
population of 250 families, is a sub-central of the Federación Sindical
Única de Trabajadores Campesinos de Cochabamba (FSUTCC), an agrarian
union federation.
Andres Cruz Martes
We
want to ratify the president because he is making changes and, thanks
to him, Bolivia is improving. We know the government well because he is
from our indigenous blood and for this reason we confide our votes in
him.
Flora Cordoba
With
this government we have seen changes like the Juancito Pinto bonus and
the Renta Dignidad [the government’s augmentation of a social security
program that gives 200 Bolivianos monthly to people over 60 years old].
It has also helped us construct roads and improved the school in our
community.

Juan Zurita (Photo: Amaru Goyes)
Juan Zurita, Secretary of Relations, FSUTCC
Manfred
has to leave because, in the referendum for autonomy, the people of
Cochabamba decisively voted no to autonomy. Manfred doesn’t respect
this democratic vote, but has tried to force the people to support
autonomy. That has caused many problems. He should leave because he is
a liar and does not successfully govern this department.
The
process that we are living through in Bolivia has made many advances.
Economic resources are reaching our communities thanks to the bilateral
agreements the President has secured with other Latin American
countries. Without a doubt, during previous governments, which had much
more international cooperation, this money was lost in the process of
execution and never reached out communities.
3:00PM – Cochabamba’s City Center
La Salle High School voting precinct
We
returned to Cochabamba and headed to the city center in order to get a
picture of what middle class voters – Manfred Reyes Villa’s base of
support – thought about the Referendum.
María Luisa Alvarado
I
support Evo Morales because he is honest and wants to redistribute
economic resources to all the people and not just one sector like the
other presidents.

Miriam Oriona Montecinos (Amaru Goyes)
I
don’t support Manfred because I don’t like corrupt people or thieves.
And Manfred is the biggest corrupt thief around. We know his father was
a thief that stole from the city and the country. And Manfred has stole
ten times more. An example, the Cochabamba’s cable car isn’t worth more
than $500,000 because it’s small and it has decayed quickly. And we
know he charged the city $3,500,000 for it; so where’s the other
$3,000,000?
Miriam Oriona Montecinos
We
Bolivians don’t know what is going to happen after the results of the
referendum. We are worried and fearful because we don’t have economic
security thanks to the terrible inflation that has existed during the
current government.
Manuel Sanchez
My
motive for participating in the recall referendum is to revoke the
president and the prefect because as authorities they have dedicated
themselves to dividing and stealing from Bolivians. Evo is creating
division and is teaching us Bolivians how to hate each other.
Manfred
doesn’t actually control the prefect’s office, but rather his secretary
general Johnny Ferrel does, who was prefect during the years of [former
military dictator and later democratically-elected president] General
Banzer.
(link to source)