Axis of Logic
Finding Clarity in the 21st Century Mediaplex

World News
Militarism Under Obama: A New Phase of the Anti-war Movement
By Jeff Nall
Toward Freedom
Friday, Apr 3, 2009

The predominantly young crowd continued to grow as the day proceeded. Bill Hackwell


On Saturday, March 21, 2009 the anti-war movement held its first national  mobilization against U.S. militarism since the inauguration of Barack Hussein Obama.  Marking the sixth anniversary of the Iraq war, about 10,000 people participated in  the March on the Pentagon, organized by the ANSWER Coalition. While there were  radical groups in attendance that viewed Obama as being little different from Bush,  Obama supporters comprised a sizeable contingent of protesters.

Kate Walsh, unofficial leader of Students Against War in Des Moines wasn’t old enough  to vote for Obama last year, but she did help get him elected. "I think I would have  voted for him because I’d rather use my vote for a candidate who has a chance rather  than voting for a third party," said Walsh who held a t-shirt and blanket stitched  peace banner adorned with supportive signatures from Des Moines students. Whether  Obama gets her first presidential election vote, however, will depend upon his Iraq  and Afghanistan policies. "I’m really opposed to the Iraq war and I don’t believe  that we should move troops to Afghanistan," said Walsh. "I want Obama to know that my  generation isn’t with him if he’s going to continue the wars there."

Holding a sign reading "I am shocked and awed," veteran Harry Parks of North Carolina  echoed Walsh’s position. "[I’m here] to remind the [Obama] administration that we  still want the war to end," said Parks who served in the Army for 28 years including  30 months flying helicopters in Vietnam. "This is the most tragic blunder in American  history—this past administration and its foray into the Middle East. I’m a retired  military veteran and I believe that defending the country is essential, but what we’ ve been doing is not defending the country. We’ve actually been occupying countries  for the wrong reasons."

Parks said he voted for Obama and believes that he is best suited to rectify the  foreign policy debacle Bush left behind. "I just don’t want (Obama) to lose site of  the fact that we absolutely must get out of the Middle East and let those people  determine what kind of government they want not the kind of government we’re trying  to give them."

Micael Bogar of Washington DC may have been dressed as a clown but her impetus for  attending the march was as solemn as it gets. Donning a red wig and nose, white face  paint, blue dress, and red and white stockings, Bogar said that her younger brother  Jason Bogar, a U.S. soldier, died in Afghanistan on July 13, 2008. "These are his dog  tags," she said lifting them from her neck to show. Holding a sign as colorful as her  outfit, Micael Bogar said that losing her brother transformed her life and led her to  realize "that fighting against war doesn’t work." "What does work for me is loving,  and understanding the way of the world and reality. And letting everyone else catch  up." Clowning, she said, is an important part of that creative process. "And peace is  a very courageous act and it takes creativity to get there, to find peace in your  life. So I’m demonstrating what my peace looks like."

Marking a new phase of the 21st century anti-war movement, protesters’ criticisms  were not limited to Iraq but encompassed general U.S. military foreign policy.  Activists condemned the U.S.’s role in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and its financial  and political backing of Israel’s assault on Gaza and continued occupation of  Palestinian territory. A relatively new but prevalent mantra was that U.S. military  spending came at the expense of desperately needed funding for jobs, education and  basic human needs

In addition to professionally crafted signs made by organizing groups, protesters  brandished a plethora of handcrafted signs and banners reading: "Obama it’s your war  now," "America is losing its soul in Gaza," "U.S. out of Afghanistan, Iraq, and  Pakistan NOW," "College not combat," "Hey Obama take a stand, U.S. out of  Afghanistan" and "OK Democrats, now stop the war."

Protesters brandished a plethora of handcrafted signs and banners reading: "Obama it’s your war now," "America is losing its soul in Gaza," "U.S. out of Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan NOW," "College not combat," "Hey Obama take a stand, U.S. out of Afghanistan" and "OK Democrats, now stop the war." Bill Hackwell


After rallying across the street from the Lincoln Memorial from about noon to 2pm  protesters marched across the Memorial Bridge on their way to the Pentagon. Anti-war  protesters were met with less than a dozen counter protesters who held up an effigy  of Jane Fonda on a noose with a sign reading: "Jane Fonda, American Bitch Traitor."  Others held signs reading "Che is dead get over it," "Al Qaeda Appeasers on Parade,"  "Peace thru strength," and "Anti-American Peaceniks think sedition is patriotic."

Along the march route protesters bellowed chants such as "Hey Obama, yes we can.  Troops out of Afghanistan" and "Barack, Barack, Barack, Afghanistan's the same as  Iraq." Protesters also called for broad ethnic unity chanting "Blacks, Latinos, Arab,  Asian, and whites, no racist war no more, no more, defend our civil rights." Other  chants addressed the economic situation: "Bail out the workers, not the war makers."

While much of the March on Pentagon, like most demonstrations, was well-rehearsed,  there were a handful of occasions when truly organic outbursts of democratic will  occurred. At one point, the march came to a halt as activists spontaneously formed a  large dance circle and moved to what may have been the most popular chant of the  demonstration: "Get up! Get down! There’s an anti-war movement in this town!"

This pause in the march, however, was used by a small group of activists to stage a  protest within the March on the Pentagon. A small group of activists who questioned  organizers’ commitment to opposing racism, flanked by a group of anarchists, created  a blockade in the route, bottling up the protest. The group soon drew the ire of  participants and ANSWER volunteers who diligently worked to funnel frustrated and  confused marchers past the blockade. Further along the route one protester from the  anarchist contingent threw a hammer into an apartment window. Some were displeased  with such tactics.

Crescenzo Scipione, 17, of Rochester, New York said that the blockade of the route  wasn’t constructive. "All it did was alienate anarchists, which is the last thing  that the broader movement needs," said Scipione. "I hate it because it perpetuates,  mainly among liberals and socialists this kind of baiting of anarchists. We need to  stop doing shit like that."

March organizers dramatized the tragic consequences of U.S. military intervention  around the world by creating about one-hundred cardboard coffins draped with flags  representing the homeland of those killed. Coffins representing fallen American  soldiers were also on hand.

Protesters carried the coffins along the route, through the Pentagon north parking  lot into downtown Crystal City where they delivered them to defense contractors  Boeing, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics and KBR amid an army of riot-gear clad  police officers.

The Arlington County Police mobilized in full riot gear in an attempt to block the demonstrators from delivering symbolic coffins at the doorsteps of the war corporations.



Though unreported by most media outlets the end of the march was marked by a tense  standoff between protesters and Arlington County Police. In an attempt to prevent  activists from placing the makeshift coffins on the proverbial doorstep of General  Dynamics-KBR dozens of police officers created a virtual wall around the facility. A  contingent of activists took direct action, however, charging toward the entrance  from an unguarded side of the building. A brigade of officers responded by cutting  off their path. Activists settled on leaving the coffins at officers’ feet. On the  street, supportive marchers looked on.

While activists sought to deliver the coffins to General Dynamics-KBR activists  gathered nearby erupting in spontaneous song. Codepink activists led marchers in  singing "Ain’t Gonna Let Nobody Turn Me Round" and "Solidarity Forever."

Excluding United for Peace and Justice’s half-a-million person protest in January  2007, the first Washington protest of the Obama administration was about one-tenth  the size of ANSWER’s September 15, 2007 march. Asked how she felt about the  considerably smaller turnout of protesters compared to the better attended marches in  2007, Rachelle van Wyck of St. Pete, Florida said that the numbers were less  important than getting the message out. "It’s that people are still committed," said  van Wyck who donned an "I can’t believe I’m still protesting this crap!" sticker.  "That we still get the message out to this president that America is concerned about  getting the troops home and that this needs to be a priority in his making policies.  He needs to know that this is not what America wants and we have spoken. And we still  say ‘bring the troops home.’"

In his March 27, 2009 article, "The Angry Left," published in the Atlantic, Will  DiNovi writes that the anti-war movement’s most significant obstacle is the formation  of a coherent message. "Though withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan was ostensibly  the theme of the day, Saturday's featured speakers railed against causes as disparate  as the embargo of Cuba, U.S. policy towards Sudan, and Israel's recent incursion into  Gaza. As protesters made their way from the National Mall toward the Pentagon and a  hub of defense contractors in Arlington, the march devolved into a vague condemnation  of ‘the military industrial complex’ rather than a targeted attack on the president's  foreign policy."

While DiNovi may bemoan the anti-war movement’s "vague condemnation of ‘the military  industrial complex’" it is worth noting Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King contention that  just such a comprehensive analysis was needed to achieve significant, lasting change  and peace. Indeed, just ten days before his death King commented that the growth of  the military industrial complex was the worst consequence of the Vietnam War. In a  March 25, 1968 interview with Rabbi Everett Gendler Dr. King said: "One of the  greatest tragedies of the war in Vietnam is that it has strengthened the military- industrial complex, and it must be made clear now that there are some programs that  we can cut back on—the space program and certainly the war in Vietnam—and get on with  this program of a war on poverty. Right now we don’t even have a skirmish against  poverty, and we really need an all out, mobilized war that will make it possible for  all of God’s children to have the basic necessities of life."

Toward Freedom

Answer Coalition- Act Now to Stop War and End Racism