See: The New York Times and the drive to war against Iran by Barry Grey, WSWS
As most readers know, the drumbeat for war on Iran has been building over the last several years in both, the imperial and alternative media. Our question is: if the US/Israeli regime plans to attack, why threaten and not simply do it. The writer of the article below tries to explain that the US and Israel have been building a case against Iran and "that the Americans and Israelis are preparing the public for war." This makes sense but how much time is required to build that case and to "prepare the public" - 5 years? Possibly.
Alternatively, the US and Israel may only have been ramping up the threat to wage war on Iran with no real intention of doing so or at least not in the near future. But to what end? Threats of war can serve a number of purposes. One may be to position themselves for global domination sometime in the future and to establish their "right and might" for waging war. The corporate media has worked hard to terrorize the world of US and Israel's ability and will to conduct pre-emptive attacks and assassinations anywhere in the world at any time. The media does so while covering their behinds with weak objections to the same US/Israeli aggression. A second tactical threat may be to force their perceived enemies to invest huge amounts of money into national defense, weakening or bankrupting their national treasury as some think they did to the Soviets during the cold war.
A more current example of the second tactic is the US military threats against Venezuela (US Southern Command bases surrounding Venezuela in Colombia and the Caribbean, violating Venezuelan air space, cross-border incursions by Colombian paramilitaries, the US 4th fleet in the Caribbean, accusing Venezuela of state-sponsored terrorism, direct verbal threats by the US State Department and members of congress) - forcing the socialist government to divert funds from popular social programs into defense spending - followed by the western media accusing Venezuela of a military buildup and posing a threat to its neighbors and the United States.
A third alternative reason for bullying and threatening may be to build fear among the Iranian people in this case, for the purpose of destabilizing the Iranian government. This would fit with their failed attempt to overthrow the goverment by initiating and fomenting the failed coup in 2009 with full support of the imperial media.
Of course it can be argued that all these tactics may eventually lead to actual military aggression against Iran in the future.
Whether the US and Israel plan to actually assault Iran in the near future is an open question. The imperial/capitalist media has been depicting Iran's nuclear energy program as a clear and present danger to the world for at least 5 years. Many well-meaning leftist websites have inadvertently joined this mission by warning everyone about the march toward war with Iran but to what end? Are we to believe that those warnings are going to somehow prevent war?
There are still other media who with slight of hand, pretend to be objective or even to object-to an attack on Iran while purposefully serving the interests of the US and Israel. In the 2009 article republished below, Ari Rusila may (or may not) be doing just that. While he claims that, "Iran has the same right to develop its nuclear program for civil and military purposes as all the other states," the weight of his analysis reflects a dangerous Iran (examine carefully his wording and images) and an all-powerful Israel, albeit with a few caveats.
At Axis of Logic we have been careful to avoid these types of collaboration with Iran's enemies by refusing to repeat and reinforce their sabre-rattling propaganda. At the same time, knowing the history of US/Israeli aggression over the last 6 decades and their pre-war preparations for the destruction of Iraq, we monitor their threats and movements of their military (e.g. warships in the Persian Gulf) and do what we can to critique the media's role and to build public opposition to war against the people of Iran.
- Les Blough, Editor
Original publication, October 16, 2009
Original publication, October 16, 2009
Iran’s nuclear program at the crossroads
by Ari Rusila
From my point of view following aspects may have influence for one or the other solutions:
- Confidential report by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that Iran is able to design and produce a workable atom bomb now
- Recent massive missile exercises implemented by Islamic Revolution Guards Corps Air Force
- Information leaks about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s secret visit to Moscow on Sept. 7
- Iran has agreed to have the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspect a previously secret nuclear facility near Qom as well transport of low-enriched uranium to France and Russia for reprocessing
- Iran’s right to develop its nuclear program for civil and military purposes
- Nobel peace prize won by U.S. President Obama
“Secret” IAEA report
One reason for re-evaluation is still “secret” IAEA report, titled “Possible Military Dimensions of Iran’s Nuclear Program”. It draws a picture of a complex program, run by Iran’s Ministry of Defense, “aimed at the development of a nuclear payload to be delivered using the Shahab 3 missile system,” Iran’s medium-range missile, which can strike the Middle East and parts of Europe. The program, according to the report, apparently began in early 2002. Senior staff members of the United Nations nuclear agency have concluded in a confidential analysis that Iran has acquired “sufficient information to be able to design and produce a workable” atom bomb. If Iran is designing a warhead, that would represent only part of the complex process of making nuclear arms. Experts say Iran has already mastered the hardest part, enriching the uranium that can be used as nuclear fuel. Most dramatically, the report says the agency “assesses that Iran has sufficient information to be able to design and produce a workable implosion nuclear device” based on highly enriched uranium. (My source: The New York Times, 4rd Oct. 2009)
Netanyahu’s secret visit to Moscow
Nearly one month there has been rumours about secret visit of Binyamin Netanyahu – Israel’s prime minister – to Moscow on September 7th; a visit which long has been denied. However an article in The London Times, which I next refer, gives quite comprehensive description about it.
Netanyahu flew to the Russian capital with Uzi Arad, his national security adviser, last month in a private jet. His office claimed he was in Israel , visiting a secret military establishment at the time. It later emerged that he was holding talks with Vladimir Putin, the Russian prime minister, and President Dmitry Medvedev. “We have heard that Netanyahu came with a list and concrete evidence showing that Russians are helping the Iranians to develop a bomb,” said a source close to the Russian defence minister last week.
IHS Jane’s interactive image analysis – published in The New York Times on 29. Sep. – about Iran’s hidden nuclear facility can be found from here.
Same time Iran has agreed to turn over most of its previously low-enriched uranium to the Russians and French for reprocessing to a higher concentration, and it will eventually be returned to them as fuel rods for a medical research reactor in Tehran.
However there is also opinions that Iran’s motivation for agreement is the quality-problem of its uranium. The impurities, certain metallic fluoride compounds, would interfere with centrifuge enrichment. The contaminated fuel it has produced so far would be all but useless for nuclear weapons. To make enough fuel for a bomb, Iran might have to start over — this time avoiding the impurities.
The Israelis believe the Iranians have “cold-tested” a nuclear warhead, without fissile material, for its Shahab-3B and Sejjil-2 rockets at Parchin, a top-secret military complex southeast of Tehran. The Islamic Revolution Guards Corps Air Force on last Sunday launched massive missile exercises during which it tested different types of modern missiles.
Iran Missile Test
Iran missile test
The western powers see military dimensions of Iran’s Nuclear Program as thread. One could sometimes consider Iran’s weaponisation activities also from Iranian point of view. In 1953 the Americans toppled their democratically-elected, pro-western government to gain control of their oil reserves. USA re-instated the Shah on his throne, then kept order via the dreaded Savak (security police) with ruthless repression for over a quarter-century. After the Islamic Revolution, during the 80′s, USA gave aid to Iraq and armed Saddam Hussein e.g with chemical weapons to use them on Iranians. After 1980, the USA has been trying to find a means to get Iran back under its thumb, to control their resources, and install a puppet government. Hated by some its neighbours and some superpowers, isolated and weak, it is easy to understand that Nuclear Weapons can be considered as necessary insurance policy in hostile environment.
From my point of view Iran has the same right to develop its nuclear program for civil and military purposes as all the other states. Iran isn’t doing anything else than USA, Soviet Union/Russia, UK, France, China, Israel, Pakistan, India, South Africa and North Korea haven’t already done. Sure Iran’s programs have been implemented clandestine, but so is the case with all others too.
Now “new” information pieces (Iran has already bomb, tests of modern missiles, secret Qom nuclear facility, Ahmadinejad still in power) are indicating that the Americans and Israelis are preparing the public for war. Even some polls now indicate that more than 60 percent of the U.S. public now favours military action against Iran. USA were aware of Russia’s cooperation on military hardware and its involvement in Iran ’s civilian nuclear program. The extent of the Iranian program with military dimension and the role of Russian and Pakistan experts underlined the growing urgency of action.
Nobel peace prize won by U.S. President Obama can now have real peace building effect – bombing Iran before Nobel ceremony would give bad image. On the other hand situation gives him the opportunity to move one step further with his initiatives. Indeed last negotiations about Iran’s nuclear programme showed some progress as well direct USA/Iran dialogue for long time.
Iran finally may be ready to make a deal. Iran’s leadership may have achieved much of what it set out to accomplish when it stepped up its clandestine nuclear program in 1999. In contentious, high-stakes negotiations, deals are possible when both sides have a chance to declare victory, and that point may have been reached.
Source: Balkan Blog