The international investigation team is becoming the laughingstock of the world.

• There was no missile involved in the downing of the Malaysian Boeing MH17.

• The contents of the black box are kept secret from the public.

• There are eyewitnesses, radar and satellite photos proving that two Ukrainian fighter jets (SU 25) were close to the Boeing at the time of the crash (incl. US satellite photos – U.S. satellite's presence proved)

• Forensic evidence exists showing that both cockpit doors were shot through by type 30-mm caliber bullets of the type SU-25 planes are equipped with.
  

• It was the aviation authorities in Kiev (specifically designated air tower at Kiev Airport), which conducted the MH17 in the war zone and in addition gave MH17 Directive of flying at 1000 meters height less than its usual cruising altitude.
  

The report by the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) was, as might be expected, altogether in US/NATO's favor. They speak in the utmost detail about BUK missiles that never existed in the Donbass region and they show in a detailed video how a BUK missile works and can be transported. It is claimed that photos exist of the shipment of such missiles from Russia to the Donbass region and back to Russia – as if these pictures could prove anything whatsoever. They could demonstrably have been taken just anywhere at any time. The huge bluff immediately reminds you of Colin Powell's demonstration on February 5, 2003 at the United Nations of what he claimed was evidence of construction of nuclear weapons in Iraq.

This present video shows a convoy loaded with a BUK battery, which is supposed to be evidence that this convoy was on its way to the Donbass region on that fateful day in July 2014. And one of the missiles that was missing on 'the way back' was claimed to have been the one that shot down the Boeing plane MH-17. Who do they really think they can fool with these childish 'proofs'?

The truth is that there never was any BUK missile in the Donbass region. The Boeing MH-17 was shot down by a Ukrainian fighter jet that was proven to have been following the Boeing plane, and later to have been flying aside the Malaysian plane. The plane (or more correctly: the planes) had been seen by several interviewed eyewitnesses from the ground, and there are also radar screens and satellite photos, which had of course also captured the fighter jets.

Forensic evidence after the crash clearly proves that the MH-17 was shot down from the side by the kind of ammunition that a Ukrainian fighter is armed with. It is made to penetrate the heavily reinforced metal in a tank. On the site where the Boeing crashed forensic technicians found the doors to the cockpit which were shot through by a large number of bullets from the fighter jets. (”How the Malaysian Airline MH17 Boeing Was Shot Down. Examination of the Wreckage” Global Research, March 6, 2015)

Machine Gun-Like Holes in the Cockpit

According to the report by German pilot and airlines expert Peter Haisenko, the MH17 Boeing 777 was not brought down by a missile. What he observed from the available photos were perforations of the cockpit:

”The facts speak clear and loud and are beyond the realm of speculation: The cockpit shows traces of shelling! You can see the entry and exit holes. The edge of a portion of the holes is bent inwards. These are the smaller holes, round and clean, showing the entry points most likely that of a 30 millimeter caliber projectile.” ¹

The black box of the Boeing plane is kept secret, and the world may never know what it contains – secrets which no doubt would have exposed the lies. The JIT report appears as a criminal and desperately ridiculous attempt to shift the blame on Russia.

The Aviation authorities in Kiev refuse to release the recordings from July 17, 2014, which is a crime against "the Chicago convention, an agreement that declares that each country must be responsible for its own country's airspace."

Michel Chossudovsky writes in July, 2016 in “Malaysian Airlines MH17 Brought Down by Ukrainian Military Aircraft. The BBC Refutes its Own Lies?” (Global Research)

”The official investigation report into MH17 flight argues that only a powerful ground-to-air missile could be responsible. Yet, there are eyewitness accounts of other aircraft seen flying next to MH17 close to impact. To further fuel the conspiracies, Russia and Ukraine blame each other but both countries are unable to provide all the critical radar data from that day.

…

“There are eyewitness accounts of other aircraft seen flying next to MH17 close to impact,” a statement from the BBC said.

“The documentary is also set to analyse the possibility that the downing of the jet was a CIA plot to pin the blame on Russia.”

”The geopolitical implications of these statements are potentially dynamite. They put Washington on the defensive.

”According to Australia News in a review of the forthcoming BBC production, the Kiev regime is identified as the culprit:

”A controversial new documentary will investigate claims that Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 was shot down by a Ukraine fighter jet, instead of a Russian missile. In a new BBC documentary titled ‘The Conspiracy Files: Who Shot Down MH17?’, eyewitnesses will share their accounts of how they saw the aircraft being downed by a nearby fighter jet.

”There are eyewitness accounts of other aircraft seen flying next to MH17 close to impact,” a statement from the BBC said.”

Testimony of Spanish Air Traffic Controller in Kiev

”The presence of the Ukrainian military jet was confirmed by Spanish air traffic controller “Carlos” at Kiev Borispol airport shortly after the plane was shot down, as well as eyewitnesses in Donetsk. (see also suppressed BBC TV report below, interviews of witnesses in Donesk)

The Spanish air traffic controller documented the event on Twitter as it happened. He claimed it was not an accident, that the Ukrainian authorities shot down MH17 and were trying to “make it look like an attack by pro-Russians”. His Twitter account was closed down shortly after the tragedy. Although his account has yet to be fully corroborated, some of his claims have been confirmed by Malaysian Airlines and the Russian authorities.” (Global Research, July 30, 2014)

Maj Wechselmann writes in jinge.se in July, 2015 (MH17 -false flag operation):

"It was the aviation authorities in Kiev (or more specifically the control tower at the Kiev Airport), which led the MH17 into the war zone and they also directed the MH17 to fly at 1000 meters lower altitude than its usual cruising altitude." ²

Chart showing the usual flight path across the sea of Azov and the path on July 17 across the war zone

The clear facts surrounding the downing of the MH-17, including forensic evidence, based on the existing doors to the cockpit was known from the start, but of course, the investigation is covered in the deepest darkness, and we can never expect an objective report from the investigation team 'JIT '. In this international group Ukraine, which had a vested interest in the outcome, was included, but not Russia, which also had a vested interest.

The absent guest was a Russian BUK missile as the cause of the crash. Pure invention and damned lies. (in Swedish "Dikt och förbannad lögn" – a quote from some writer)

Paul Craig Roberts  writes in “How American Propaganda Works: 'Guilt By Insinuation'”

“The Russian Defense Ministry pointed out that at the moment of destruction of MH-17 an American satellite was flying over the area

“The Russian government urges Washington to make available the photos and data captured by the satellite”. (Global Research)

Julie Lévesque writes in Global Research in July 2014

“The U.S., despite its global spying apparatus, has not shown any radar or satellite imagery to back its claim that Russia and the Eastern-Ukrainian opposition are responsible for the downing of MH17. The evidence it has presented so far is weak and based on pro-Kiev documents consisting of YouTube videos and various social media – “all of which are admittedly unverifiable and some of which is veritably fabricated.”:

”Is US intelligence simply reading blogs? Or are the blogs somehow a clearing house of US intelligence? Or are the blogs fabrications by US intelligence in an attempt to frame Russia? One in particular, “Ukraine at War,” is a definitive collection of fabrications, biased propaganda, and dubious claims that appear to precede “US intelligence” claims.” (Assigning Blame to East Ukraine Rebels: US Appeals to “Law of the Jungle” in MH17 Case – by Tony Cartalucci, Global Research)

Another also very important point, as many skeptics have cited as a fact that the separatists confessed to being the culprits in the downing of the plane MH-17 - also by Julie Lévesque:

“A few hours after the crash, Kiev authorities presented a video in which the opposition admitted shooting down the plane. Experts who studied the video concluded that it was a fabrication.

“The tape’s second fragment consists of three pieces but was presented as a single audio recording. However, a spectral and time analysis has showed that the dialog was cut into pieces and then assembled. Short pauses in the tape are very indicative: the audio file has preserved time marks which show that the dialog was assembled from various episodes.” (ibid.)

Michel Chossudovsky also writes in an article from July 2014 (Global Research)

”Moreover, the political threats and insinuations directed against the Russian Federation in the wake of the July 17 disaster, have been coupled with a renewed wave of economic sanctions directed against major Russian corporations and financial institutions.”

Eric Zuesse writes in November, 2014–

”We’ll go considerably farther than has yet been revealed by the professional intelligence community, to provide the actual evidence that conclusively shows that (and how) the Ukrainian Government shot down the Malaysian airliner, MH-17, on July 17th.” (Global Research)

“The latest report from the intelligence community was headlined on August 3rd, 2014 by Robert Parry, “Flight 17 Shoot-Down Scenario Shifts,” and he revealed there that (Consortium News)

“Contrary to the Obama administration’s public claims blaming eastern Ukrainian rebels and Russia for the shoot-down of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, some U.S. intelligence analysts have concluded that the rebels and Russia were likely not at fault and that it appears Ukrainian government forces were to blame, according to a source briefed on these findings.

“This judgment — at odds with what President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry have expressed publicly — is based largely on the absence of U.S. government evidence that Russia supplied the rebels with a Buk anti-aircraft missile system that would be needed to hit a civilian jetliner flying at 33,000 feet, said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “

Eric Zuesse continues – November 2014

”It’s actually based on lots more than that; it’s based not on an absence of evidence, but on positive proof that the Ukrainian Government shot the plane down, and even proving how it was done. You will see this proof, right here, laid out in detail, for the first time.”³

Anti-Russian and anti-Putin propaganda is incredibly dangerous for world peace. Washington has never shown any evidence of its allegations of Russian liability for this enormous crime. They also have no scruples when it comes to put the blame on another country, especially on Russia. The whole thing was clearly a "false flag" operation to make Russia seem to be the culprit.

It is certainly not the first time that Washington so grossly misjudges a political situation. It is more the rule than the exception that they are careless with the truth in this way, and that they engineer "false flag" operations. Washington is desperate and about to lose the Cold War, its position as the world's policeman and owner of the world's resources. Putin expresses himself calmly and objectively, and he gets the world to look at the United States as a nation in hysterical death throes. How long do we have to tolerate this destructive, unscrupulous and totally corrupt monster?

Notes:

1. ”If we now consider the armament of a typical SU 25 we learn this: It is equipped with a double-barreled 30-mm gun, type GSh-302 / AO-17A, equipped with: a 250 round magazine of anti-tank incendiary shells and splinter-explosive shells (dum-dum), arranged in alternating order. The cockpit of the MH 017 has evidently been fired at from both sides: the entry and exit holes are found on the same fragment of it’s cockpit segment.

"Now just consider what happens when a series of anti-tank incendiary shells and splinter-explosive shells hit the cockpit. These are after all designed to destroy a modern tank.

2. MH17 – ”False flag”-operation? Jinge.se. Also: Global Research - ”The Flight Path of MH17 Was Changed. July 17 Plane Route was over the Ukraine War zone” and, again, Global Research - ”Malaysian Airlines MH17 Was Ordered to Fly over the East Ukraine War zone”.

3. "If you listen to the voices from Washington now who speak of a “potentially tragic error / accident”, all that remains is the question of what might have been the nature of this “mistake” perpetrated here. I am not given to hover long in the realm of speculation, but would like to invite others to consider the following : The MH 017 looked similar in it’s tricolor design to that of the Russian President’s plane. The plane with President Putin on board was at the same time ”near” Malaysia MH 017. In aviation circles “close” would be considered to be anywhere between 150 to 200 miles. Also, in this context we might consider the deposition of Ms. Tymoshenko, who wanted to shoot President Putin with a Kalashnikov.

But this remains pure speculation. The shelling of the cockpit of air Malaysia MH 017, however, is definitely not speculation.” (Revelations of German Pilot: Shocking Analysis of the “Shooting Down” of Malaysian MH17. “Aircraft Was Not Hit by a Missile” Global Research, July 30, 2014)