axis
Fair Use Notice
  Axis Mission
 About us
  Letters/Articles to Editor
Article Submissions
RSS Feed


Canada’s Electoral Dysfunction Printer friendly page Print This
By Larry Gordon, Fair Vote Canada
Fair Vote Canada
Friday, Oct 17, 2008

Further to the Axis of Logic article entitled Another triumph in Canadian democracy, consider the following email message issued October 15 by Fair Vote Canada.

 

 

It's been a remarkable 48 hours.

 

In the seven years since Fair Vote Canada was launched, we have never experienced the level of media and public interest in voting reform that we are seeing right now. Yesterday, four FVC spokespeople were kept busy just handling media interviews. New memberships are pouring in, along with people wanting to volunteer.

 

Momentum for electoral reform is growing. We thank you for your continuing support. Below is our post-election press release.

 

Larry Gordon

Executive Director

Fair Vote Canada

 

Electoral dysfunction, yet again. Greens deserved more than 20 seats - voting system also punished New Democrats, western Liberals and urban Conservatives.

 

Once again, Canada's antiquated first-past-the-post system wasted millions of votes, distorted results, severely punished large blocks of voters, exaggerated regional differences, created an unrepresentative Parliament and contributed to a record low voter turnout.

 

The chief victims of the October 14 federal election were:

 

  • Green Party:  940,000 voters supporting the Green Party sent no one to Parliament, setting a new record for the most votes cast for any party that gained no parliamentary representation. By comparison, 813,000 Conservative voters in Alberta alone were able to elect 27 MPs.
  • Prairie Liberals and New Democrats:  In the prairie provinces, Conservatives received roughly twice the vote of the Liberals and NDP, but took seven times as many seats.
  • Urban Conservatives:  Similar to the last election, a quarter-million Conservative voters in Toronto elected no one and neither did Conservative voters in Montreal.
  • New Democrats:  The NDP attracted 1.1 million more votes than the Bloc, but the voting system gave the Bloc 50 seats, the NDP 37.

 

"How can anyone consider this democratic representation?" asked Barbara Odenwald, President of Fair Vote Canada.

 

Had the votes on October 14 been cast under a fair and proportional voting system, Fair Vote Canada projected that the seats allocation would have been approximately as follows:

 

Conservatives - 38% of the popular vote: 117 seats (not 143)

Liberals - 26% of the popular vote: 81 seats (not 76)

NDP - 18% of the popular vote: 57 seats (not 37)

Bloc - 10% of the popular vote: 28 seats (not 50)

Greens - 7% of the popular vote: 23 seats (not 0)

 

Odenwald emphasized that any projection on the use of other voting systems must be qualified, as specific system features would affect the exact seat allocations.

 

"With a different voting system, people would also have voted differently," said Larry Gordon, Executive Director of Fair Vote Canada. "There would have been no need for strategic voting. We would likely have seen higher voter turnout. We would have had different candidates - more women, and more diversity of all kinds. We would have had more real choices."

 

 

Fair Vote Canada (FVC) is a national multi-partisan citizens' campaign to promote voting system reform. FVC was founded in 2001 and has a National Advisory Board of distinguished Canadians from all points on the political spectrum.

Printer friendly page Print This
If you appreciated this article, please consider making a donation to Axis of Logic. We do not use commercial advertising or corporate funding. We depend solely upon you, the reader, to continue providing quality news and opinion on world affairs.Donate here




World News
AxisofLogic.com© 2003-2015
Fair Use Notice  |   Axis Mission  |  About us  |   Letters/Articles to Editor  | Article Submissions |   Subscribe to Ezine   | RSS Feed  |