|
|
Toxic waste trickles toward New Mexico's water sources
Print This
By Frank Clifford
Los Angeles Times
Monday, Nov 2, 2009
|
Radioactive debris has been found in canyons that drain into the Rio Grande.(Brian Vander Brug/ Los Angeles Times)
|
|
Reporting from Los Alamos, N.M. - More
than 60 years after scientists assembled the nuclear bombs dropped on Hiroshima
and Nagasaki, lethal waste is seeping from mountain burial sites and moving
toward aquifers, springs and streams that provide water to 250,000 residents of
northern New Mexico.
Isolated on a high plateau, the Los Alamos National
Laboratory seemed an ideal place to store a bomb factory's deadly debris. But
the heavily fractured mountains haven't contained the waste, some of which has
trickled down hundreds of feet to the edge of the Rio Grande, one of the most
important water sources in the Southwest.
So far, the level of
contamination in the Rio Grande has not been high enough to raise health
concerns. But the monitoring of runoff in canyons that drain into the river has
found unsafe concentrations of organic compounds such as perchlorate, an
ingredient in rocket propellent, and various radioactive byproducts of nuclear
fission.
Laboratory officials insist that the waste doesn't jeopardize
people's health because even when storm water rushing down a canyon stirs up
highly contaminated sediment, it is soon diluted or trapped in canyon bottoms,
where it can be excavated and hauled away.
"We are seeing no human or
ecological risk," said Danny Katzman, director of the lab's water stewardship
program. "We won't be surprised on occasion to see a higher than normal reading.
But those higher values last for 40 minutes during a flood, and maybe two hours
out of a year."
Much surface contamination, however, becomes embedded in
sediment or moves down into groundwater. That subterranean migration poses the
greatest long-term danger to drinking-water wells and ultimately the Rio Grande.
"When you see a child's footprints and Tonka toys in canyons where there
is plutonium, there is reason to believe that a lot more work needs to be done
to make the environment safe," said Ron Curry, secretary of the New Mexico
Environment Department.
In 2002, the department issued an extensive
cleanup order stating that waste at Los Alamos may pose "an imminent and
substantial endangerment to human health and the environment." Laboratory
officials accused the department of exaggerating the threat and resisted the
order for several years before agreeing to a revised plan to scrub about 2,000
dirty sites by 2015.
As part of that effort, about 300 monitoring wells
and gauges have been installed. Contaminated soil is being removed from canyon
bottoms. Wetlands are being planted and small dams built to arrest the flow of
polluted storm water. In the summer, the lab began loading some of its hottest
radioactive waste into sealed containers by remote control and trucking it to a
federal underground storage facility in Carlsbad, N.M.
Ambitious as it
is, the plan deals with surface sites, not tainted aquifers. About 18 million
cubic feet of waste is sequestered at Los Alamos. No one knows how it is
slipping through scrambled layers of rock described by Katzman as "unbelievably
complex geology."
Moreover, scientists at Los Alamos say they haven't
determined where all of the waste was buried across the laboratory's
40-square-mile property. And they acknowledge that some of the monitoring wells
used to measure contamination in deep groundwater may have failed to detect
certain radioactive isotopes.
Adding to the uncertainty, a draft report
released last summer by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said that
the lab may have substantially underreported the extent of plutonium and tritium
released into the environment since the 1940s.
More recently, the state
Environment Department reported finding DEHP, an organic compound used in
plastics and explosives, at 12 times the safe exposure level in an aquifer that
supplies drinking water to Los Alamos and the nearby community of White Rock.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency classifies DEHP as a probable human
carcinogen also capable of harming reproductive systems.
In another
surprise, water from a broken main flushed out buried waste near an old
plutonium processing plant last year and pushed it beyond the largest dam built
to stop the spread of contamination. Analysis of sediment by the U.S. Department
of Energy's Oversight Bureau revealed "the highest concentrations [of plutonium]
the bureau has ever recorded for this medium."
One of the canyons where
radioactive waste has been found joins the Rio Grande just three miles above a
diversion project the city of Santa Fe is building to capture nearly 3 billion
gallons of water annually from the river. The $200-million project, scheduled to
start operating in two years, is being designed to screen out and treat
contaminated water. But not all radioactive isotopes are easily treatable.
Tritium, which has been detected near the Rio Grande, bonds with
water.
The directors of the diversion project -- while publicly
expressing their confidence in the treatment system -- have been quietly urging
the laboratory to do more to stop waste from moving toward the
river.
George Rael, assistant manager of environmental operations at the
lab, said it would cost as much as $13 billion to remove all accessible
contamination. Even if there were enough money available, exhuming the waste
could put more people at risk than leaving it alone -- at least in the short
run.
"Some of the waste offers quite a challenge," said David McInroy,
director of the lab's corrective action program. Digging it up, he said, could
expose workers and others to a toxic cloud of debris. If left in place, it might
turn up years later in groundwater.
With a population of more than
12,000, Los Alamos today is a far different place than it was in 1943 when the
secret weapons complex was known as "Site Y."
The lab conducts
climate-change research, screens AIDS vaccines, evaluates new tests for breast
cancer and analyzes biological pathogens. Yet most of its budget still goes
toward national defense. Los Alamos is the nation's sole manufacturer of
plutonium pits, the triggers for nuclear weapons, and it continues to produce
toxic waste.
Many residents of Los Alamos have become inured to the
hazards of their environment. They hike and picnic in canyons dotted with toxic
hot spots.
Just north of Los Alamos, the Santa Clara Pueblo recently
installed air monitors that confirmed fears that the wind carries radioactive
dust.
Joseph Chavarria, head of Santa Clara's environmental affairs
department, said dust settles on the ground after it rains and contaminants are
absorbed by edible plants. He said even potters are at risk: "When we make
pottery, we test the texture of the clay by putting it in our
mouths."
Pueblo officials would not reveal the levels of contamination
detected by the air monitors. "I can say they were high enough to raise concerns
about the future," said Santa Clara Gov. Walter Dasheno. "It made me think it
might not always be safe to live here."
Los Angeles Times
Print This
|
If you appreciated this article, please consider making a donation to Axis of Logic.
We do not use commercial advertising or corporate funding. We depend solely upon you,
the reader, to continue providing quality news and opinion on world affairs. Donate here
|
|
World News
|