Monsanto Faces Rising Grassroots Opposition in South Africa
Print This
By Dr. Nombulelo Siqwana-Ndulo
Food First
Wednesday, Apr 21, 2010
Editorial note:The criminal attempts at owning the world's food supply
by bio-tech companies, such as Monsanto, Syngenta, et al. are among the
most critical issues we are facing today and we must fight against
those lethal attempts with tooth and nail. And all this is done for the
horrendous profit of a few totally callous people who run these killer
companies. If they are allowed to spread their products world wide,
their activities will turn the earth into a sterile and dried out land
where nothing healthy and truly productive that can save the lives of
the billions in our world, can thrive any more. The plague will spread,
is spreading, and politicians, even in Europe, are being caught up in
this horror game, for personal gain no doubt - what else, seeing the
vast amount of scientific proof that goes squarely against the bio-tech
lies of increased production and harmless products. See the EU
Commission president José Manuel Barroso's latest stand on this issue -
'GMOs in Barroso’s basket'
See also my essay 'Monsanto – Public Enemy No. 1' of September, 2009
Siv O'Neall
Multinational seed and chemical companies looking to gain a new
customer base in Africa are facing increasing resistance from both
farmers and consumers. Nonetheless, they are making inroads by
partnering with African institutions and governments that are eager to
‘modernize' their agricultural sectors. South Africa is of particular
importance in this regard. The country has gone against the grain of
general distrust of GMOs in Africa to become a gateway for the
distribution of GM food aid; the commercialization and export of GM
seeds; and experimentation with GM crops not approved elsewhere.[i]
But here too, they face mounting opposition. In July 2009, for
instance, the South African government rejected
the commercial release application for GM potatoes after the
Executive Council, a government licensing body, concluded that the
toxicology studies were "inadequate, scientifically poorly designed and
fundamentally flawed." It was also reported that, in 2008/2009, 80% of Monsanto's GM
maize in South Africa failed to produce a crop, leading
critics to call for urgent investigation and a ban on all GM foods.
In 2002, the South African government, in partnership with U.S.-based
biotech firm Monsanto, launched the so-called Massive Food Production
Program (MFPP) in the country's Eastern Cape Province. The Eastern Cape
is characterized by a dual economy in which the western half of the
province (previously white South Africa under apartheid) is dominated by
commercial agriculture while the eastern half consists of subsistence
agriculture. After the advent of democracy in 1994, there was tremendous
pressure to develop the rural economy here.
MFPP is a "flagship program" of the South African government designed
to bring about agrarian transformation through a "green revolution."[ii]The program operates by granting subsidies
(which are phased out over time) and credit to small farming communities
to purchase fertilizers, pesticides and GM or hybrid seeds. Through
MFPP, Monsanto has essentially been elevated to the status of a
government "extension agency" responsible for educating and training
farmers about GM seeds and technologies. Of course, as a private
company, they are unlikely to share with farmers the potentially
disastrous effects of planting their land with GM crops. Rather, they
advise farmers to buy and use the recommended agrochemicals. They also
instruct them to plant only GM maize, as a monoculture, instead
of intercropping with beans or pumpkins as they have done for centuries
to ensure their food security.
A white farmer
interviewed by GRAIN, paid to mentor an MFPP community, acknowledged
that the cost of the inputs was just too high for small farmers to
afford on their own,without continuing to amass debt. He was quoted
saying he was "tempted to tell farmers to just buy food with the money"
as their losses would be less than growing the food themselves through
MFPP.
South African farmers are becoming increasingly aware of the
deception that GM seeds and technologies will bring development and pull
them out of poverty, as their experiences have not born out these
claims. In populations with low literacy levels, the farmers are given
little or no information about the effects of planting GM seeds, until
it is too late, that is. It is not surprising that western consumers who
are largely literate and have access to information are wary of GM
foods.
Tragically, even the government officials in charge of
co-implementing the MFPP program are ignorant of GMOs. A number NGOs and
Human Rights organization have taken on the responsibility of educating
the farmers about the effects of planting GMOs.
The constitution of South Africa, hailed as one of the most
progressive in the world, obligates the government to take steps to
protect its citizens. As part of the Consumer Protection Act, the
government is indeed drafting policies to regulate GMOs, but many NGOs
say it is unclear who will implement and monitor these regulations.
What's more, the South African NGO Safeage
reports that the U.S. seed company Pannar and the Swiss firm Syngenta
are partnering with local businesses to introduce a program of their own
called AfriCan, targeting the poor farmers inthe Eastern Cape who have
yet to be reached. The project incorporates farmers into a
contract-farming scheme linking them to credit, GM seeds and chemical
inputs-much like MFPP. The pilot project, which hopes to be reproduced
throughout Africa, was launched in March 2010 with 500 farmers (with .5
to 4 hectare plots) and will run for 18 months.[iii]
Despite claims that there have been no substantiated threats to human
and animal health caused by GM crops, subsistence farmers who
participated in the MFPP project testified to the contrary in a workshop
held by the NGO Biowatch (SA). A farmer from the organization Siyazakha
expressed her dismay of the quality of "mielies" (maize), a staple
food, produced with"free" seeds from the project. She stated, "the
mielies produced are making us sick; they break easily and are bad
quality. When we give it to our chickens it affects them, we want to
grow our own seed and protect them". Another small-scale farmer from
Siyazakha, pointed out that using fertilizers destroys the soil after
just a few years and food can no longer be grown on it. He stressed that
they want use manure and produce crops using traditional farming
methods.[iv]
The South African government has also followed the lead of the United
States on consumer information, refusing to label food in the stores so
that people can make informed choices about what they consume. During a
recent debate with parliamentarians on the GMO issue, Michelle Pressend from
Biowatch stated, "there is little transparency. We are in danger of
multi-national concerns driving our food policy."
As they learn about the dangers of using GMOs, and share their
negative experiences, poor farmers are organizing themselves to resist
the assault on their seeds, farmland, farming traditions, health and
autonomy. Via Campesina leads the campaign to educate farmers and to
fight for farmers' rights. Despite the South African government's
cooperation with Monsanto and other biotech companies, the
agro-ecological agriculture movement is growing and farmers are
rejecting GM seeds. Farmers are building their seed banks and
alternative models are emerging and growing. Despite the government
ignoring such initiatives, farmers are seeking out the information and
using it to protect their rights and ensure their food sovereignty.
[ii] For an in-depth analysis of MFPP in South Africa
see: GRAIN "Lessons from the Green Revolution in South Africa"
Seedling, October 2008. http://www.grain.org/seedling/?id=568
Dr. Nombulelo Siqwana-Ndulo is a
Sociologist and activist working on development issues with a focus on
gender, the environment and policies that affect the livelihoods of poor
farmers. She was born in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa, in
the rural district of Dutywa. She holds a Ph.D in Sociology from UCLA
and a MA degree in Development Studies from the Institute of Social
Studies (ISS), the Hague, the Netherlands. Dr. Siqwana-Ndulo has
participated in various policy task teams in South Africa and
collaborated on research projects on socio-economic conditions in the
Eastern Cape. She has served on numerous boards and committees including
Biowatch SA, the Joint Centre for Political and Economic Studies, and
the Trust for Community Outreach and Education (TCOE). She currently
works as an independent consultant, activist and freelance writer on development and social justice issues.
If you appreciated this article, please consider making a donation to Axis of Logic.
We do not use commercial advertising or corporate funding. We depend solely upon you,
the reader, to continue providing quality news and opinion on world affairs.Donate here