axis
Fair Use Notice
  Axis Mission
 About us
  Letters/Articles to Editor
Article Submissions
RSS Feed


Freedom like we've never had it before. The Humiliating "Services" of the TSA in the United States. But why do they do it? Printer friendly page Print This
By Suzanne Choney (MSNBC). Les Blough (Axis of Logic)
MSNBC
Sunday, Nov 21, 2010

Editor's Commentary: The stories told below are repeated thousands of times every day, in one form or another, as the U.S. government steps up it's humiliating treatment of its citizens on the streets and in airports across the country. Deep down, most people know that the state aggression against us has nothing to do with terrorism, national nor personal security.

We've seen and experience it in peaceful protests where armored police in Star War attire attack us us verbally, with gas, water cannons, tasers, batons and guns. We've also seen and experienced it in airports, randomly calling people out of line after they and their baggage have passed through the x-ray machines, ordering people to either expose themselves fully in body scanners or strip searches or to subject themselves to strangers who grope them, feel their genitals and other private parts. They harrass us publically, calling attention to us as "problem passengers" in full view of other travelers. They give us the "option" of looking at our virtual nakedness in body scanners, strip searching us or groping us with their hands.

When we object, they call public attention to us, present us as a threat to the security of those around us. If we attempt to explain our predicament, they further debase us by expressing sympathy and "concern", patronizing us as though we are their children. More objections lead to a uniformed airport cop tearing up our airline ticket before our eyes and escorting us from the airport - just to teach us a lesson. Refusing to obey gives them reason to haul us off to jail. Other travelers who view this treatment become fearful for themselves and sympathetic toward us. The still ignorant are thankful that they are being protected from "the terrorists."

If not for the security reasons they allege, why is the government insisting on these searches? It certainly doesn't encourage us to vote for them in the next election. But then, politicians "win" elections in the US whether we want them in office or not. Let's say it again: The United States of America is not a democracy.

We posit at least two reasons for this new level of oppression:

The first is the state demonstrating its power and "right" to humiliate people into new levels submission, breaking their spirits and stripping them of their intelligence and willfullness. The second reason is closely related to the first: In the last decade, those who control the U.S. government have demonstrated before the world, their ability to intentionally wreck nations, destroy cultures, imprison, rape, torture and kill with impunity. They increase their belligerance without apology or any serious attempt to justify or even rationalize their crimes against humanity. The psychological impact of this behavior serves them and their agenda well. Their message is, "We are fighting an eternal war on terror. We have set new limits to your freedom and there's not a goddamned thing you can do about it. It's for your own good. Shut up and do as we say ... or else."

In effect, the state is telling us that we have no right to question nor complain and that regardless, our objections will have no effect on their policies and actions. It is a tactical maneuver applying humiliation as an instrument of domination. If they can force you to take down our pants in the presence of strangers, what other demands can you hope to refuse or deny them? Their objective is to overwhelm, leaving us with a sense of futility and helplessness, eliminating any impediment or shred of resistance to their dominance over our lives. Another rather obvious result of this domestic insult is to detract attention away from their theft of the national treasury and US foreign policy and its wars abroad. The corporate media's heavy emphasis on stories like those told by MSNBC is also worth thinking about. The more outraged we become about this treatment, the less we focus on the economy and war.

A third reason that the police state as emerged in airports across the U.S., Canada and Europe is money. The TSA received $6.8 Billion in 2008, budgeted by the Democrat controlled congress. In the first quarter of that year, the profits of L-3 Communications, a private contractor selling body scanners to the TSA, soared:

L-3 Communications. First Quarter Profit, 2008

Diluted earnings per share increased 19% to $1.54

Net sales increased 6% to $3.5 billion

Net cash from operating activities of $93 million

Record funded orders of $4.1 billion and record funded backlog of $10.1 billion

Michael Strianese, CEO of L-3 communications received $3.5 Million in salary and bonuses that year and almost $20 Million in stock options.

The only remaining question is what if anything will we do about this broad insult on our person and society. What will be our response? The masters of the ruling class are forcing us either into total submission - or to rise up against them and pay the price of the freedom and dignity that should define us as human beings.

- Les Blough, Editor

Young Boy Strip Searched By TSA



TSA forces cancer survivor to show prosthetic breast

A longtime Charlotte, N.C., flight attendant and cancer survivor told a local television station that she was forced to show her prosthetic breast during a pat-down.

Cathy Bossi, who works for U.S. Airways, said she received the pat-down after declining to do the full-body scan because of radiation concerns.

The TSA screener "put her full hand on my breast and said, 'What is this?' " Bossi told the station. "And I said, 'It's my prosthesis because I've had breast cancer.' And she said, 'Well, you'll need to show me that.' "

Bossi said she removed the prosthetic from her bra. She did not take the name of the agent, she said, "because it was just so horrific of an experience, I couldn't believe someone had done that to me. I'm a flight attendant. I was just trying to get to work."

For Americans who wear prosthetics — either because they are cancer survivors or have lost a limb — or who have undergone hip replacements or have a pacemaker, the humiliation of the TSA's new security procedures — choosing between a body scan or body search — is even worse.

Musa Mayer has worn a breast prosthesis for 21 years since her mastectomy and is used to the alarms it sets off at airport security. But nothing prepared her for the "invasive and embarrassing" experience of being patted down, poked and examined recently while passing through airport security at Dulles International Airport in Washington, D.C.

"I asked the supervisor if she realized that there are 3 million women who have had breast cancer in the U.S., many of whom wear breast prostheses. Will each of us now have to undergo this humiliating, time-consuming routine every time we pass through one of these new body scanners?" she said in an e-mail to msnbc.com.


'I was so humiliated'

Marlene McCarthy of Rhode Island said she went through the body scanner and was told by a TSA agent to step aside. In "full view of everyone," McCarthy said in an e-mail, the agent "immediately put the back of her hand on my right side chest and I explained I wore a prosthesis.

"Then, she put her full hands ... one on top and one on the bottom of my 'breast' and moved the prosthesis left, right, up, down and said 'OK.' I was so humiliated.

"I went to the desk area and complained," McCarthy wrote. "The woman there was very nice and I asked her if the training included an understanding of how prosthetics are captured on the scanner and told her the pat-down is embarrassing. She said, 'We have never even had that discussion and I do the training for the TSA employees here, following the standard manual provided.' She said she will bring it up at their next meeting."

If she has to go through the scanner again, McCarthy said, "I am determined to put the prosthesis in the gray bucket," provided to travelers at the security check-ins for items such as jewelry.

"Let the TSA scanners be embarrassed .... not me anymore!" she wrote.



Sharon Kiss, 66, has a pacemaker, but also has to fly often for her work.

"During a recent enhanced pat-down, a screener cupped my breasts and felt my genitals," she said in an e-mail to msnbc.com "To 'clear my waistband' she put her hands down my pants and groped for the waistband of my underwear.

"I expressed humiliation and was told 'You have the choice not to fly.' "

The remark infuriated Kiss, who lives in Mendocino, Calif. "Extrapolate this to we should not provide curb cuts and ramps for people confined to wheelchairs because they can choose to stay home ... This a violation of civil rights. And because I have a disability, I should not be subjected to what is government-sanctioned sexual assault in order to board a plane."


TSA: Pilots to be exempt from some airport security checks

No planned changes to security

So far, the government is not letting up on the enhanced screening program. TSA administrator John Pistole said this week at a Congressional hearing on the matter that "reasonable people can disagree" on how to properly balance safety at the nation's airports, but that the new security measures are necessary because of intelligence on latest attack methods that might be used by terrorists.


Gail Mengel, of Blue Springs, Mo., is used to being patted down; she had a hip replacement five years ago.

"I admit that I was relieved when I flew last week and was able to spend a few seconds in front of the X-ray screen in Seattle and Denver," she said in an e-mail to msnbc.com.

"I have heard medical experts say the level of radiation will not hurt us. And frankly I was happy to realize I won't have my body touched, patted and rubbed anymore.

"Unfortunately last weekend, I arrived at the New Orleans airport and learned that airport staff (was) still being trained in using the X-ray machine. Because my hip replacement sets off the security buzzer, I was faced with the new regulations."

While she is "used to" being patted down, "this experience was certainly much more personal, uncomfortable and embarrassing," she said. "Every part of my body was touched. I do not want to be harmed by radiation, but the experience was painless and quick compared to what I have faced over the last five years. I support security measures but I also hope we can be assured of safe procedures."


One man, from Nashville, wrote in an e-mail that "as a handicapped person, I am sick and tired of being 'raped' at the security line. I lose my crutches and leg orthotics to be 'nuked' by the X-ray machine. Then manhandled by the pat-down, followed by chemical swabbing for 'possible explosives.' ...Enough is enough."

Said [Musa] Mayer, the longtime breast cancer survivor: "I am outraged that I will now be forced to show my prosthesis to strangers, remove it and put in the X-ray bin for screening, or not to wear it at all whenever I fly. To me, this seems unfairly discriminatory and embarrassing for me, and for all breast cancer survivors."


Thomas D. Sawyer

A retired special ed teacher
, a bladder cancer survivor, who wears a urostomy bag, was utterly humiliated and broke down in tears, because he ended up soaked in his own urine after suffering through a traumatic TSA pat-down.

The bag collects his urine via an opening in his stomach.

This is what it’s come to. This is why you hear rumblings of the terrorists having won the idiotically named War on Terror(ism):

“I was absolutely humiliated, I couldn’t even speak,” said Thomas D. “Tom” Sawyer, 61, of Lansing, Mich. [...] “If the seal is broken, urine can leak all over my body and clothes.”

Of course, it goes without saying that the TSA team was polite, compassionate, sensitive, and apologetic for any inconvenience or embarrassment they caused:

Due to his medical condition, Sawyer asked to be screened in private. “One officer looked at another, rolled his eyes and said that they really didn’t have any place to take me,” said Sawyer.

After that, Sawyer convinced them– yes, he had to convince them– to take him into a private office. Wasn’t that compassionate, sensitive, and apologetic of them?

Because he wears pants two sizes too large (due to his medical equipment), once he took off his belt, his pants fell right down around his ankles.

And naturally, once the agents realized his distressing predicament and how self-conscious Sawyer must have felt, they treated him with the respect he deserved and handled the matter more delicately:

“I had to ask twice if it was OK to pull up my shorts,” said Sawyer, “And every time I tried to tell them about my medical condition, they said they didn’t need to know about that.” [...]

“One agent watched as the other used his flat hand to go slowly down my chest. I tried to warn him that he would hit the bag and break the seal on my bag, but he ignored me. Sure enough, the seal was broken and urine started dribbling down my shirt and my leg and into my pants.” [...] They never apologized. They never offered to help. They acted like they hadn’t seen what happened. But I know they saw it because I had a wet mark.”

So a very wet, very mortified, and very appalled Sawyer had to schlep through the airport soaked in his own urine, and remain that way until after the plane was in the air, at which time he could finally get inside a cramped bathroom to wash up.

If instilling a feeling of security and patriotism is important to the powers that be, it might be wise to consider the fact that Americans have feelings, and they also have medical conditions that don’t always fit neatly into the TSA’s feel-up-your-neighbor methods.

Some of us need more attention and care than others. And some of us may even begin to retaliate publicly and at the polls.

“[I]f this country is going to sacrifice treating people like human beings in the name of safety, then we have already lost the war.”

Not to mention lost our dignity.

H/t: TexBetsy

Source: MSNBC

 

 

 

 

 

Printer friendly page Print This
If you appreciated this article, please consider making a donation to Axis of Logic. We do not use commercial advertising or corporate funding. We depend solely upon you, the reader, to continue providing quality news and opinion on world affairs.Donate here




World News
AxisofLogic.com© 2003-2015
Fair Use Notice  |   Axis Mission  |  About us  |   Letters/Articles to Editor  | Article Submissions |   Subscribe to Ezine   | RSS Feed  |