The US-sponsored plot to kill Patrice Lumumba,
the hero of Congolese independence, took place 50 years ago this week.
|
Patrice Lumumba was the first prime minister of the Democratic Republic of the Congo in 1960, after decades of colonial despotism. He was killed in 1961.
|
Patrice
Lumumba, the first legally elected prime minister of the Democratic Republic of the Congo
(DRC), was assassinated 50 years ago yesterday, 17 January 1961. This heinous
crime was a culmination of two inter-related assassination plots by American
and Belgian governments, which used Congolese accomplices and a Belgian
execution squad to carry out the deed.
Ludo
De Witte, the Belgian author of the best book on this crime, qualifies it as
"the most important assassination of the 20th century". The
assassination's historical importance lies in a multitude of factors, the most
pertinent being the global context in which it took place, its impact on
Congolese politics since then and Lumumba's overall legacy as a nationalist
leader.
For
126 years, the US and Belgium have played key roles in shaping Congo's destiny.
In April 1884, seven months before the Berlin Congress, the US became the first
country in the world to recognise the claims of King Leopold II of the Belgians
to the territories of the Congo Basin.
When
the atrocities related to brutal economic exploitation in Leopold's Congo Free
State resulted in millions of fatalities, the US joined other world powers to
force Belgium to take over the country as a regular colony. And it was during
the colonial period that the US acquired a strategic stake in the enormous
natural wealth of the Congo, following its use of the uranium from Congolese
mines to manufacture the first atomic weapons, the Hiroshima and Nagasaki
bombs.
With
the outbreak of the cold war, it was inevitable that the US and its western
allies would not be prepared to let Africans have effective control over
strategic raw materials, lest these fall in the hands of their enemies in the
Soviet camp. It is in this regard that Patrice Lumumba's determination to
achieve genuine independence and to have full control over Congo's resources in
order to utilise them to improve the living conditions of our people was
perceived as a threat to western interests. To fight him, the US and Belgium
used all the tools and resources at their disposal, including the United
Nations secretariat, under Dag Hammarskjöld and Ralph Bunche, to buy the
support of Lumumba's Congolese rivals , and hired killers.
In
Congo, Lumumba's assassination is rightly viewed as the country's original sin.
Coming less than seven months after independence (on 30 June, 1960), it was a
stumbling block to the ideals of national unity, economic independence and
pan-African solidarity that Lumumba had championed, as well as a shattering
blow to the hopes of millions of Congolese for freedom and material prosperity.
The
assassination took place at a time when the country had fallen under four
separate governments: the central government in Kinshasa (then Léopoldville); a
rival central government by Lumumba's followers in Kisangani (then
Stanleyville); and the secessionist regimes in the mineral-rich provinces of
Katanga and South Kasai. Since Lumumba's physical elimination had removed what
the west saw as the major threat to their interests in the Congo,
internationally-led efforts were undertaken to restore the authority of the
moderate and pro-western regime in Kinshasa over the entire country. These
resulted in ending the Lumumbist regime in Kisangani in August 1961, the
secession of South Kasai in September 1962, and the Katanga secession in
January 1963.
No
sooner did this unification process end than a radical social movement for a
"second independence" arose to challenge the neocolonial state and
its pro-western leadership. This mass movement of peasants, workers, the urban
unemployed, students and lower civil servants found an eager leadership among
Lumumba's lieutenants, most of whom had regrouped to establish a National
Liberation Council (CNL) in October 1963 in Brazzaville, across the Congo river
from Kinshasa. The strengths and weaknesses of this movement may serve as a way
of gauging the overall legacy of Patrice Lumumba for Congo and Africa as a
whole.
The
most positive aspect of this legacy was manifest in the selfless devotion of
Pierre Mulele to radical change for purposes of meeting the deepest aspirations
of the Congolese people for democracy and social progress. On the other hand,
the CNL leadership, which included Christophe Gbenye and Laurent-Désiré Kabila,
was more interested in power and its attendant privileges than in the people's
welfare. This is Lumumbism in words rather than in deeds. As president three
decades later, Laurent Kabila did little to move from words to deeds.
More
importantly, the greatest legacy that Lumumba left for Congo is the ideal of
national unity. Recently, a Congolese radio station asked me whether the
independence of South Sudan should be a matter of concern with respect to
national unity in the Congo. I responded that since Patrice Lumumba has died
for Congo's unity, our people will remain utterly steadfast in their defence of
our national unity.
Georges Nzongola-Ntalaja is professor of
African and Afro-American studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill and author of The Congo from Leopold to Kabila: A People's History