The president's jobs bill doesn't have a chance in Congress - and the
occupiers on Wall Street and elsewhere can't become a national movement
for a more equitable society - unless more Americans know the truth
about the economy.
Here's a short (2 minute 30 second) effort to rebut the seven biggest
whoppers now being told by those who want to take America backwards. The
major points:
Tax cuts for the rich trickle down to everyone else. Baloney.
Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush both sliced taxes on the rich and what
happened? Most Americans' wages (measured by the real median wage)
began flattening under Reagan and has dropped since George W. Bush.
Trickle-down economics is a cruel joke.
Higher taxes on the rich would hurt the economy and slow job growth. False.
From the end of World War II until 1981, the richest Americans faced a
top marginal tax rate of 70 percent or above. Under Dwight Eisenhower it
was 91 percent. Even after all deductions and credits, the top taxes on
the very rich were far higher than they've been since. Yet the economy
grew faster during those years than it has since. (Don't believe small
businesses would be hurt by a higher marginal tax; fewer than 2 percent
of small business owners are in the highest tax bracket.)
Shrinking government generates more jobs. Wrong again.
It means fewer government workers - everyone from teachers, fire
fighters, police officers, and social workers at the state and local
levels to safety inspectors and military personnel at the federal. And
fewer government contractors, who would employ fewer private-sector
workers. According to Moody's economist Mark Zandi (a campaign advisor
to John McCain), the $61 billion in spending cuts proposed by the House
GOP will cost the economy 700,000 jobs this year and next.
Cutting the budget deficit now is more important than boosting the economy. Untrue.
With so many Americans out of work, budget cuts now will shrink the
economy. They'll increase unemployment and reduce tax revenues. That
will worsen the ratio of the debt to the total economy. The first
priority must be getting jobs and growth back by boosting the economy.
Only then, when jobs and growth are returning vigorously, should we turn
to cutting the deficit.
Medicare and Medicaid are the major drivers of budget deficits. Wrong.
Medicare and Medicaid spending is rising quickly, to be sure. But
that's because the nation's health-care costs are rising so fast. One of
the best ways of slowing these costs is to use Medicare and Medicaid's
bargaining power over drug companies and hospitals to reduce costs, and
to move from a fee-for-service system to a fee-for-healthy outcomes
system. And since Medicare has far lower administrative costs than
private health insurers, we should make Medicare available to everyone.
Social Security is a Ponzi scheme. Don't believe it.
Social Security is solvent for the next 26 years. It could be solvent
for the next century if we raised the ceiling on income subject to the
Social Security payroll tax. That ceiling is now $106,800.
It's unfair that lower-income Americans don't pay income tax. Wrong.
There's nothing unfair about it. Lower-income Americans pay out a
larger share of their paychecks in payroll taxes, sales taxes, user
fees, and tolls than everyone else.
Demagogues through history have known that big lies,
repeated often enough, start being believed - unless they're rebutted.
These seven economic whoppers are just plain wrong. Make sure you know
the truth - and spread it on.
Robert Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the
University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national
administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President
Bill Clinton. He has written thirteen books, including "The Work of
Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," "Supercapitalism" and his latest
book, "AFTERSHOCK: The Next Economy and America's Future." His 'Marketplace' commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.
If you appreciated this article, please consider making a donation to Axis of Logic.
We do not use commercial advertising or corporate funding. We depend solely upon you,
the reader, to continue providing quality news and opinion on world affairs.Donate here