 |
| (Photo: sarah-ji / Flickr) |
Have Democrats abandoned teacher unions in their pursuit of a
corporate-backed education overhaul? From the looks of the Democratic
National Convention, it would seem so.
At the podium, speakers like Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel and former
North Carolina Governor Jim Hunt praised the Obama administration's
willingness to embrace such change, singling out the controversial Race
to the Top program for special attention. The program requires states to
link teacher evaluations to student standardized test scores and pushes
charter schools and 'turnarounds'—in which at least 50 percent of
teachers are fired—to replace struggling public schools.
The program fits perfectly with the corporate reform agenda of
destroying job security for teachers, privatizing public schools,
testing everything, and turning whatever can be quantified into a
statistic, no matter how disconnected from the realities of teaching
children.
As he praises corporate reform on the federal level, Emanuel has
fomented a confrontation over education reform in his hometown. The
26,000-member Chicago Teachers Union looks to be heading for a strike
Monday over class size, better funding for school programs and services,
fair pay, and job security.
Observers see the strike as a "which side are you on?" moment for
Democrats. On one side is the teacher union, which says too big class
sizes, too few school services, and too little support for teachers are
the problems. On the other are the corporate-education pushers, who heap
blame on bad teachers.
"There are two distinct constituencies with conflicting goals and
we're going to highlight that with a strike. You can't gloss over it
very easily," says Bill Lamme, a Chicago public high school teacher.
Some Chicago teachers think Obama could not stomach a strike in his
hometown on the eve of the November election and will lean on Emanuel,
his former chief of staff, to settle. Others fear national Democrats
could welcome the chance to look tough by fighting the union. If the
Democratic convention is any indication, their fears may be warranted.
Parent Tricker
The teacher-bashing at the Democratic convention started Monday with a
pre-release screening of the anti-union drama "Won't Back Down,"
sponsored by Democrats for Education Reform.
DFER is a political action committee made up of hedge fund managers
seeking investment opportunities in education. The group supports
privatization, vouchers, merit pay, teacher evaluations based on student
test scores, and doing away with teacher tenure. It flaunts its
hostility toward teacher unions.
The film, starring Maggie Gyllenhall and Viola Davis, shows a mother
and a teacher battling an evil teachers union to convert their
struggling public school into a charter through a "parent trigger" law.
While at first blush it sounds like a feel-good tale of community
empowerment, the film has drawn sharp criticism from teacher advocates
for its unfavorable portrayal of urban teachers and their unions.
The film shows "bad teachers" locking students in closets, making
personal phone calls during class, forbidding bathroom breaks, and
refusing to help students after school, citing fictitious "union rules"
that prohibit them from doing so. The union, in turn, is cast as these
teachers' self-interested protector, with one union official attributing
a made-up quote to teachers union leader Albert Shanker, saying she'll
start caring about children when they start paying dues.
"I don't recognize the teachers portrayed in the movie, and I don't
recognize that union," said Randi Weingarten, president of the American
Federation of Teachers in a press release last week.
The average viewer would never guess that teachers across the country
work an average of 53 hours per week, planning lessons, talking to
parents, grading papers, and giving struggling students on-on-one help
in addition to their daily classroom duties. In Chicago, the average
number of hours worked is 58, according to a University of Illinois
study.
They'd never guess that teacher unions like the CTU would be willing
to walk out not only for better working conditions, but also in pursuit
of a well-rounded, well-resourced education for their students.
Instead, viewers see lazy teachers who need to be removed and an
obstructionist union standing in the way of making improvements for the
kids.
Despite the mismatch with reality, the Democratic National Committee
showed the film, which also played to a standing ovation at the
Republican National Convention last week. The White House declined to
weigh in on the decision to screen it. Reports say DNC Executive
Director Patrick Gaspard, who spent nine years at SEIU 1199, made the
call to show the film.
The DNC not only signed off on the screening, but some of the party's
best and brightest joined in on a panel to promote the "parent trigger"
afterward. Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson, wunderkind Newark Mayor Cory
Booker, and Antonio Villaraigosa, Los Angeles mayor and convention
chair, joined corporate-education champion Michelle Rhee and Ben Austin
of the California-based astroturf group Parent Revolution for the
discussion.
In fact, Democrats aligned with the corporate education agenda were
instrumental in the US Conference of Mayors' endorsement of parent
trigger as part of their education platform. Villaraigosa voiced his
support for the measure at a June press conference after the resolution
was passed, saying, "parent trigger is one of a number of tools we need
to achieve the highest standards in our urban schools."
The real story of parent trigger, however, is not exactly Hollywood material.
Parent trigger laws, in place in seven states, allow for schools to
be gutted of their staff, turned over to private charter operators, or
shut down completely, by a simple majority vote of parents.
Parent Revolution, which gets funding from foundations backed by
Walmart billionaires, is behind the only two attempts thus far to pull
the trigger.
At McKinley Elementary in Compton, outside Los Angeles, the group had
already chosen a company to operate the hypothetical new charter school
when Parent Revolution staffers began canvassing parents with petitions
for "school improvements."
Parents alleged intimidation and the Compton school board ultimately
rejected the petition due to the lack of a legally required review
process in choosing the charter operator.
When parents at Desert Trails Elementary in Adelanto, California,
began questioning Parent Revolution's proposed restructuring plans, a
judge ruled that they couldn't take back their signatures from the
trigger petition. So much for democracy.
In March, a parent trigger bill was introduced in Florida, backed by
Parent Revolution and Jeb Bush's Foundation for Florida's Future.
Heavy lobbying by the very parents the legislation's supporters said it would empower defeated the bill.
The 330,000-member Florida Parent Teacher Association led a coalition
of parent groups against the bill, including Parents Across America and
Fund Education Now. They alleged that the legislation, called "parent
tricker" by opponents, had nothing to do with empowering parents and
everything to do with privatizing public schools.
Bashing Unions at Home
Watching these Democrats whip the anti-teacher wagon is no surprise to those who've dealt with them back home.
Villaraigosa, a former union organizer with the United Teachers of
Los Angeles, has pulled away from his labor roots to become one of the
corporate education agenda's most vocal proponents. In a 2010 Huffington
Post editorial, he
called teacher unions an "unwavering roadblock to reform." The L.A.
mayor has also been a huge backer of school privatization, particularly
through the city's School Choice program that has closed scores of
schools and handed them to private entities. (Teachers, meanwhile, fought alongside parent and student groups to keep schools in public hands and launch reform initiatives that met student needs.)
Villaraigosa was an active supporter of the corporate reform groups'
successful lawsuit that tied L.A. teacher evaluations to student test
scores, going so far as to personally file an amicus brief advocating
the change. Teachers say basing everything on test scores kills student
inquiry and reduces learning to rote memorization and test practice.
Booker, a rising star in the Democratic Party and 2016 presidential
hopeful, sits on Democrats for Education Reform's advisory board. He has
called teacher tenure "poisonous" and not only supported Republican New
Jersey Governor Chris Christie's sweeping attack on tenure, but also
said it didn't go far enough.
The new law ties the granting of tenure to student standardized test
scores, but still allows for seniority to be used in the case of
layoffs.
Booker, who's been a strong proponent of charters in Newark, has
gotten some flak for his ties to hedge fund managers and venture
capitalists. In his first mayoral race, Mitt Romney's Bain Capital was among his biggest funders.
Even Democratic Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, who's been
openly skeptical about charter schools, supported an initiative that
gutted seniority rights for teachers in the state. He even went so far as to say that he'd intended to tackle the issue himself.
Taking a Stand
And of course there's Rahm Emanuel in Chicago, who has continued a
decades-long push by Democrats in the city to starve schools in Black
and brown neighborhoods of resources, implement test-score evaluations,
close schools and fire staff, and open charters. Lately, he's been
pushing a longer school day and year, ignoring the many hours teachers
put in after school and at home, and acting like more time—not
resources—will fix what ails public schools.
Chicago teachers have pushed back against Emanuel and have gained
ground even without a settlement, getting the city to create 500 new
teaching positions for understaffed schools, securing recall rights for
recently displaced teachers, and forcing merit pay off the table.
In a report last year, CTU noted that
research on merit pay has showed no benefit to student achievement or
in retaining better teachers, and has harmed trust and collaboration
among peers. Merit pay schemes, however, have further skewed instruction
toward test prep.
Lamme says Democrats know that a defeat of the corporate education agenda in Chicago could reverberate on the national stage.
"They can't give in too much and allow for a turning point," he said.
"They see the stakes like we do. That's why we're trying to turn the
tide on these horrible policies."
Source: Truth-Out