 |
| Photo Credit: DeSmogBlog |
Two dozen protestors were arrested Monday morning in Washington
D.C. in a demonstration against proposed liquefied natural gas (LNG)
export terminals in the U.S., according to environmental groups
reporting from the scene.
Maryland’s Chesapeake Bay is the latest battleground in a campaign
to halt the export of fracked gas and slow the damage done by increased
drilling. The protesters were arrested at a sit-in in front of the
headquarters of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, after
demanding that the agency reject Dominion Energy’s application for an
export facility at Cove Point in Lusby, MD.
The sit-in followed a Sunday rally where community members,
activists and experts from a coalition of over 40 groups met in the
sweltering heat and humidity of the National Mall to protest the proposed Cove
Point export facility. The coalition, which included the Chesapeake
Climate Action Network and the Climate Reality Check Coalition, allege
that FERC has ignored evidence of the harmful effects of fracking to the
environment and to the health of communities who live in areas where
drilling and liquefaction takes place.
“I think it’s great that FERC employees had an inconvenience
getting to work today, because they inconvenience a lot of people,” Alex
Lotoro, one of the arrestees told DeSmogBlog.
Lotoro says that FERC employees are removed from the frontline
impacts, so protestors brought the impacts to them. "They have to see
the faces of the people they’re affecting,” he said. “That makes me feel
better, because they have to deal with a little bit of what we’re
dealing with every day.”
Linda Morin, a member of Calvert Citizens for a Healthy Community, a
local group in the Cove Point, MD area, lives about a mile from what is
currently a licensed LNG import facility. In a conference call before
the Sunday rally, she spoke about the dangers of Dominion’s proposed
expansion. “Our community had never been informed about the potential
risk that we’ve faced since 2006 of fatal flash fires should a major
leak lead to a vapor cloud and ignite,” she said. “The expansion will
increase those risks by orders of magnitude and pose additional risks to
our population.”
Across the country, energy companies are applying for and receiving
permits to liquefy and export shale gas. The Cove Point facility will
cost Dominion $3.8 billion and allow the company to export a proposed
5.25 million tons of gas per year starting in 2017. Demand abroad for
natural gas has the potential to intensify the level of drilling, and
while this might be good for the nation’s gross domestic product, it’s
bad news for the community members whose lives and land have been
impacted by water, air and safety hazards caused by fracking.
Currently, FERC is considering applications for as many as 14 LNG
export terminals, and two have already been approved at Coos Bay, Oregon
and Hackberry, Louisiana. In both cases, the Department of Energy
argued that opponents did not demonstrate how export facilities that
yielded net economic benefits to the U.S. would be inconsistent with the
public interest.
The natural gas boom has been billed as America’s ticket to energy
independence. Dominion CEO Thomas F. Farrell II credits fracking for
starting a global energy revolution, likening the U.S. to a “new Middle
East.” And while President Obama has used the Environmental Protection
Agency to cap emissions from coal-fired power plants, he has called
natural gas a “bridge fuel that can power our economy with less of the
carbon pollution that causes climate change.”
When burned, natural gas releases about half as much carbon dioxide
as coal. Yet many activists, scientists and journalists contend that
the greenhouse gas footprint is much larger than is often represented by
industry proponents when methane leaks are taken into account.
Exporting LNG could increase that footprint even further. “Just the
refrigerators required to liquefy LNG add on enormous fossil fuel
energy on top of the already very leaky greenhouse gas footprint from
the fracked gas itself,” biologist and fracking activist Sandra
Steingraber said during the conference call.
Since the advent of fracking, U.S. natural gas production has risen
from 18 trillion cubic feet in 2005 to 24 trillion cubic feet in 2013.
Currently, domestic prices are low—$4.31 per million Btu—but as supplies
have increased, energy companies have begun looking toward foreign
markets to bolster demand. If prevailing policies remain unchanged, the
U.S. Energy Information Administration predicts that the U.S. will
become a net exporter of LNG by 2016.
According to Tyson Slocum, director of Public Citizen’s Energy
Program and a speaker at the Sunday rally, as more export facilities
open, the domestic price of gas will increase. “The industry is highly
attuned to the market price of the commodity that they are pulling out
of the ground,” said Slocum. “What LNG exports is all about is providing
opportunity for domestic drillers to sell their natural gas for a price
higher than what is currently charged in the United States.”
FERC is set to finalize its decision on Dominion’s permit to export
LNG in August. If the application is approved, activists will consider a
number of options, including an appeal to the US Court of Appeals, or
asking the Department of Commerce to enforce a section of the 1975
Energy Policy & Conservation Act that prohibits the export of both
crude oil and natural gas produced in the U.S. While a ban on crude oil
exports is still in effect, the Commerce Department never followed
through in writing rules banning the export of natural gas.
In the present political and economic climate, chances are slim,
but the alternative is undeniable. “If that market price
increases…that’s going to have a upward pressure on prices and that’s
going to create a larger financial incentive to increase fracking,” said
Slocum. That’s not something that participants in Sunday’s rally,
particularly those from the community of Lusby, want to live with.
Source: Alternet
|
Print This 
Print This 