axis
Fair Use Notice
  Axis Mission
 About us
  Letters/Articles to Editor
Article Submissions
RSS Feed


Changes In The Sun Are Not Causing Global Warming, New Study Shows Printer friendly page Print This
By News Bulletin
Science Daily
Saturday, May 16, 2009

With the U.S. Congress beginning to consider regulations on greenhouse gases, a troubling hypothesis about how the sun may impact global warming is finally laid to  rest.

Carnegie Mellon University's Peter Adams along with Jeff Pierce from Dalhousie  University in Halifax, Canada, have developed a model to test a controversial  hypothesis that says changes in the sun are causing global warming.

The hypothesis they tested was that increased solar activity reduces cloudiness by  changing cosmic rays. So, when clouds decrease, more sunlight is let in, causing the  earth to warm. Some climate change skeptics have tried to use this hypothesis to  suggest that greenhouse gases may not be the global warming culprits that most  scientists agree they are.

In research published in Geophysical Research Letters, and highlighted in the May 1  edition of Science, Adams and Pierce report the first atmospheric simulations of  changes in atmospheric ions and particle formation resulting from variations in the  sun and cosmic rays. They find that changes in the concentration of particles that  affect clouds are 100 times too small to affect the climate.

"Until now, proponents of this hypothesis could assert that the sun may be causing  global warming because no one had a computer model to really test the claims," said  Adams, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Carnegie Mellon.

"The basic problem with the hypothesis is that solar variations probably change new  particle formation rates by less than 30 percent in the atmosphere. Also, these  particles are extremely small and need to grow before they can affect clouds. Most do  not survive to do so," Adams said.

Despite remaining questions, Adams and Pierce feel confident that this hypothesis  should be laid to rest. "No computer simulation of something as complex as the  atmosphere will ever be perfect," Adams said. "Proponents of the cosmic ray  hypothesis will probably try to question these results, but the effect is so weak in  our model that it is hard for us to see this basic result changing."

Journal references:

   1. J. R. Pierce and P. J. Adams. Can cosmic rays affect cloud condensation nuclei by altering new particle formation rates?
Geophys. Res. Lett., 2009; (in press) DOI: 10.1029/2009GL037946

   2. Richard A. Kerr. Study Challenges Cosmic Ray-Climate Link.
Science, 2009; 324 (5927): 576 DOI: 10.1126/science.324_576b

Adapted from materials provided by Carnegie Mellon University.

Science Daily
Printer friendly page Print This
If you appreciated this article, please consider making a donation to Axis of Logic. We do not use commercial advertising or corporate funding. We depend solely upon you, the reader, to continue providing quality news and opinion on world affairs.Donate here




Featured
AxisofLogic.com© 2003-2015
Fair Use Notice  |   Axis Mission  |  About us  |   Letters/Articles to Editor  | Article Submissions |   Subscribe to Ezine   | RSS Feed  |