While the world's top military elites gather inside a fortified hotel
to discuss NATO's future, protesters question the organization's
legitimacy, secrecy, and the lack of democratic debate about the
increasingly unpopular war in Afghanistan.
An imposing 'United States of America'-emblazoned aircraft greeted
visitors on the tarmac of Halifax International Airport Friday, as more
than 250 of the Western world's top military leaders and their brain
trust descended on the city for the inaugural Halifax International Security Forum.
Co-sponsored
by the government of Canada and the U.S.-based German Marshall Fund
think tank, over 60 percent of the attendees hailed from these host
nations for what is being dubbed a World Economic Forum-style
conference for militarists.
Announcing the Forum last July,
German Marshall Fund President Craig Kennedy called it "a step in the
process of changing the conversation" about Canada's role in the
'trans-Atlantic community,' toward a recognition of its being a
top-tier power in its own right that is worthy of a seat at the table
with the globe's most powerful war-fighting nations.
Canada's
transformation to a counterinsurgency-capable expeditionary force and
its contribution to the war in southern Afghanistan has earned it the
respect of NATO's key power, the United States, which, in turn, has
boosted its global profile among other NATO allies.
In the
opening session featuring Canadian Minister of Defence Peter MacKay and
U.S. Secretary of Defence Robert Gates, MacKay said "We take great
pride in knowing that Canadian's contribution to transatlantic
cooperation as a steadfast reliable friend and ally is recognised."
Gates
lauded Canada as a "major contributor" to the Afghan war and for
helping to "hold the line in the South before U.S. reinforcements
arrived", following a mini-surge that began in the latter days of the
Bush administration, and was subsequently bolstered by President Barack
Obama's addition of over 20,000 troops to the conflict since last March.
Currently,
the Obama administration is deliberating over whether or not to
implement an Iraq-style "surge" of upwards of tens of thousands of
troops into Afghanistan. Canada's former Chief of Defence Staff, Rick
Hillier, who spoke on a panel about the war with Republican Senator
John McCain Saturday, said "The surge...is fundamental here, it's
absolutely essential."
For his part, Senator McCain insisted that
the Iraqi surge can be replicated in Afghanistan and that within the
next year to 18 months, "We can turn the situation around."
Reflecting
its parallels with other high-profile meetings among global elites,
most of the Forum's agenda is off-the-record and closed to the media.
Aside from the more than 25 journalists who are 'embedded' inside the
proceedings, where comments can only be reported based on 'Chatham
House Rules' - that is, not for attribution to particular individuals -
most reporters are given limited access to the panelists and attendees,
and are sequestered in a press room under tightly controlled conditions.
During
his prepared remarks, Peter MacKay referred to this format as "a chance
where people can speak openly, honestly, among friends", albeit largely
outside of public scrutiny. Contrary to its undemocratic overtones,
MacKay told IPS that he feels the conference is "an example of
democracy promotion, having an international forum such as
this...talking about issues that relate to the democracies of the
world".
MacKay also spoke proudly to IPS about instances where
"the United States and Canada have collaborated in the past on
democracy promotion, certainly Afghanistan is a good example of that."
The
Halifax Forum took place on the heels of Afghan President Hamid
Karzai's inauguration, following NATO-sponsored elections last August
that are widely seen to have been fraudulent.
The biggest such
conference ever to be hosted in Canada, Halifax was seen as the ideal
site given its strategic geographic location, and its position as a
launching site for many of Canada's military forces. Although Halifax
is known as a pro-military community, outside on Friday a small group
of protesters denounced the forum, which they called a "war conference"
that is being held to "work out the justification for the global
expansion of NATO and to extend the ongoing illegal occupation of
Afghanistan".
On Saturday, a larger protest took place which
featured former Afghan parliamentarian Malalai Joya, who has been
touring North America promoting her new book, "A Woman Among Warlords".
An
outspoken critic of the ongoing occupation of her country, Joya has
called for NATO to withdraw its forces. No Afghans participated in the
Forum itself, and Joya was forced to deliver her short speech while
separated from the Forum venue by a wall of police.
Joya told the
several dozen boisterous protesters that the invasion of her country
pushed the Afghan people "from the frying pan into the fire because
they brought into power a photocopy of the Taliban", referring to the
corrupt government of Karzai, which is comprised of many known warlords
and suspected war criminals.
Joya added that a surge of U.S.
troops in Afghanistan "will translate into killing more innocent
people", and argued that "the policies of the Obama administration in
Afghanistan are no different from that of Bush".
During a press
briefing Friday, Sen. McCain told IPS that he would be "glad to meet"
with Joya, and acknowledged that "she has kindred spirits here in
Canada and in the United States who share exactly her view".
A
CBS poll earlier this week showed that 69 percent of U.S. citizens
think the Afghan war is on the wrong track, the highest ever level of
opposition that has been registered during the eight-year occupation.
Despite this, McCain added that "the majority of Afghan people don't
share that particular position".
Apparently unfamiliar with
Joya's position toward the unpopular war, McCain said, "in the course
of our conversation, I would have to also try to get from her how she
views the situation in Afghanistan after all the troops are gone."
Earlier
this week, Joya told IPS correspondent Chris Arsenault, in a sit-down
interview, that, "The war in Afghanistan has fostered terrorism, even
though the stated goal is to fight it. The biggest beneficiaries of the
conflict have been extremist groups who take advantage of legitimate
grievances against NATO."
"They [the occupying forces] say if
troops leave, the Taliban will eat us. But they are supporting the
Taliban today, supporting warlords. Both of them are eating us. To
fight against one enemy is easier than two. We are between two enemies
[the occupiers and the extremists]," she said, urging an immediate
troop withdrawal.
Common Dreams/ISP