Overshadowed by
narco-violence, another showdown with far-reaching consequences is
unfolding near the Mexico-U.S. border. Striking workers have occupied a
Grupo Mexico-owned copper mine and vow to resist any company or
government attempts to evict them from the premises. Last month, a
Mexican federal court blocked legal efforts to uphold a labor contract.
Since July
2007, Section 65 of the National Union of Miners, Metal, and Allied
Workers in Cananea, Sonora, has held firm in a strike against Grupo
Mexico over contract and safety issues. Three months prior to the
strike, Mexico's Labor Ministry took 72 corrective actions. An
inspection later that year by a delegation of independent Mexican and
U.S. occupational health and safety experts discovered large
accumulations of deadly dust. But hot on the heels of a January 2008
ruling by the Federal Labor and Conciliation Board that the strike was
illegal, federal and Sonora state police violently removed the
strikers. The union won legal appeals, but a higher labor court finally
came down on the side of the company and the Calderon administration
last February 11. Trade unionists, elected officials, and opposition
activists sharply criticized the strike-breaking legal move. "We are
back in 1906. There is no rule of law in Mexico," affirmed opposition
leader Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador. "The judicial power is rotten, and
as is the case with all the institutions, at the service of the
oligarchy."
Ironically, the
current strike takes place at a site that holds great relevance for
this year's 100th anniversary celebration of the 1910 Mexican
Revolution. Many historians consider the 1906 strike at the Cananea
mine, which was then owned by North Americans who called on Arizona
Rangers to bloodily suppress the workers' movement, a key catalyst of
the revolutionary upheaval that swept Mexico a few years later. The
Cananea decision was but the latest in many ominous developments for
the Mexican labor movement. Last October, the Calderon administration
unilaterally seized the Central Light and Power Company that serves
Mexico City and surrounding areas, firing more than 44,000 members of
the Mexican Electrical Workers Union (SME), one of the few militant and
independent unions in the country.
Not backing
down, the SME mounted stiff protests and helped organize a partial,
one-day national strike of sympathetic unions last December. But calls
for a bigger general strike have yet to translate into concrete
actions, and the majority of SME members have reportedly accepted
government severance payments and offers of small business assistance.
According to news reports, similar severance packages have been
prepared for the Cananea strikers. For Calderon's Labor Secretary
Javier Lozano, the February 11 court ruling to declare the strike
illegal was a decision made "in accordance with the law." Supported by
some Mexican legislators, the striking miners are attempting to revoke
Grupo Mexico's concession to operate the Cananea mine.
The Squeeze on Workers
The battles
involving Mexico's electricians and miners take place amid
deteriorating conditions for the country's workers. According to
official figures cited in the Mexican press, the unemployment rate shot
up from 3.39% at the beginning of 2006 to early 6% by the end of 2009.
However, the official joblessness rate masks the fact that more than 12
million Mexicans, or nearly 30% of the workforce, make their living
selling goods and labor in the informal sector. Already at
quarter-century lows, the purchasing power of Mexican workers took a
severe beating in 2009 and early 2010, when price hikes for fuel, food,
and other basic necessities were rendered doubly burdensome by
regressive tax increases. At the same time, many workers did not
receive their annual Christmas bonuses for the important holiday
spending season. Worse yet, substandard or temporary jobs are the only
ones available to many Mexican workers.
According to
the spokeswoman for an independent organization that advocates for
women factory workers in Aguascalientes, the Great Recession has led to
unsafe working conditions, unpaid overtime, fewer benefits, and
speed-ups on the shop floor.
"Workers are
accepting more and more unfavorable conditions," said Sara Montes,
coordinator of the Raiz Collective. A major trend accelerated by the
crisis is the greater use of temporary labor by employers. "Every year,
you see that temporary contracts of one month or three months are the
order of the day," Montes said. According to the labor activist,
workers in Aguascalientes' export-oriented factories, or maquiladoras,
earn a base salary of about $5 per day.
Daniel Rocha,
coordinator for the Center for Labor Studies and Action, a labor
advocacy group in Ciudad Juarez, also noted a deterioration in working
conditions in the border maquiladora industry. Rocha said the firing of
75 Foxconn workers after a February 18 protest broke out at the
electronic manufacturer's new Ciudad Juarez plant was a troubling sign
for labor rights. Many of the workers were employed by temporary
agencies under contract with Foxconn, which produces components for
industry giants like Dell. Rocha said outsourcing is becoming more
common in Ciudad Juarez, with some contracts lasting as little as 15
days at a time. "It is not just in Foxconn," Rocha said. "It is in
other maquiladoras too." A recent study by the Mexico City-based Center
for Labor Research and Union Advisement (CILAS) estimated that fully
10% of the nation's workforce is now employed by temp agencies like
Manpower.
Adios to the Class Struggle
To formalize the
brave new world of capital-labor relations, business groups and the
Calderon administration seek to overhaul Mexico's labor law. Pending
approval by the Mexican Congress, the reforms backed by Labor Secretary
Lozano include making strikes harder to call, allowing multi-tasking in
the workplace, extending probation and training times at below normal
starting wage, changing shift and wage rules, and expanding
outsourcing. Labor advocates like Montes agree that the country's labor
law needs changing, but worry about the creep of precarious, temporary
work standards under the guise of "flexibility." In Montes' view, labor
law reform should emphasize guaranteeing free and fair union elections.
For decades,
many Mexican workers have been legally represented by unions affiliated
with the former ruling Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI). An
integral part of the corporatist state that ruled Mexico, the unions
acted as power brokers that guaranteed millions of votes to PRI
politicians in return for modest concessions. But with corporatist
unions and "white unions" negotiating sweetheart deals directly with
employers, it was—and still is—common that many workers do not even
know they are represented by a union. Independent labor activists
frequently criticize the traditional unions for not stepping up to the
plate for the workers they presume to represent. In Aguascalientes, for
example, unions have been slow to address women's occupational health
and safety concerns, according to Montes. "We do the work they should,"
she said. In fundamental ways, though, even the old corporatist, or
"charro," unions are increasingly obsolete in Mexico's rush to
globalization and the replacement of the old centralized PRI regime in
favor of a more fractured, alternating set of political arrangements
between different parties.
Many of these
unions undermined their own role by agreeing to employer-worker acts
that suppressed wages and restricted the right to strike in the name of
fighting inflation and upholding national unity. Backed by the PRI as
well as President Calderon's National Action Party, reforms to the IMSS
and ISSSTE public employee pension funds pried open the door to
privatized accounts managed by foreign financial firms that undermined
labor solidarity.
Union
corruption scandals have been another huge factor in weakening the
potential power and public credibility of the labor movement. Every new
order needs a legitimizing ideology, and the modern Mexican system is
no exception. In this sense, a class-free political perspective is
gaining more ground. Lorena Martinez, adjunct secretary-general of the
PRI, which intends to win more state elections this year and recapture
the Mexican presidency in 2012, was recently quoted as saying that
instead of class struggle a new labor-capital collaboration is required
to work "hand in hand in a just equilibrium."
NAFTA's Union-Free Landscape
In many ways,
the emerging set of capital-labor relations in Mexico mimics the ones
perfected in the United States, where outsourcing, speed-up, and
"win-win" labor-capital contracts took hold long ago, in which strikes
and grievances were shelved in return for supposed labor participation
in company decision-making and profit-sharing. In the United States,
the results have been disastrous for the labor movement and workers. In
2010 union representation is at a historic low, and the purchasing
power of U.S. workers is at its skimpiest in recent memory.
A sea of more
than 23 million unemployed or underemployed workers, according to the
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, creates downward pressure on wages and
working conditions, and means there are plenty of workers willing to
accept increasingly low-paid, non-union jobs with few or non-existent
benefits. The same is true for Mexico, but more so. The Great Recession
has been a boon to capital as workforces are thinned out, wage
pressures are contained, and productivity is cranked up to new heights.
Other developments in the United States resemble events long familiar
in Mexico. In an ongoing wave of International Monetary Fund-like
ordered structural adjustments, public workers face lay-offs, mandatory
furloughs, and wage cuts as state and municipal treasuries continue to
reel from budget crises and pension busts stemming from Wall Street
pillage and looting.
According to a
new report from the Washington, DC-based Center on Budget and Policy
Priorities (CBPP), 45 states and the District of Columbia cut public
services in 2008 and 2009. Local and state governments slashed 172,000
jobs in an employment hemorrhaging that could have been worse if not
for $140 billion in federal stimulus allocations to the states. To put
the amount in perspective, the stimulus spending was roughly equivalent
to the sum set aside last year for executive compensation by the United
States' six largest banks, according to Rolling Stone magazine.
The CBPP
projects total U.S. state budget shortfalls to reach $375 billion in
2010 and 2011, likely leading to additional lay-offs, service cuts, and
outsourcing schemes.
In early March,
the Los Angeles Unified School Board agreed to send preliminary pink
notices to more than 5,000 teachers. In Mexico, many municipalities
find themselves in the same circumstances. In Puerto Vallarta, for
instance, a city which depends on free-spending foreign tourists found
itself in a $60 million hole at the beginning of the year.
In both
nations, a slew of regressive sales taxes, fee hikes, and tuition
increases are stinging the middle and working classes. North and south
of the border, cross-party, conservative coalitions are blocking
grassroots demands to make the rich pay their fair share of the crisis.
Teachers, one of the few organized sectors of labor left standing, are
under fierce attack. Bush's No Child Left Behind Law inspired a mass
firing of instructors at Rhode Island's Central Falls High School last
month that many fear constitutes a declaration of war against
educators. In Mexico too, teachers are the new bogeyman for a growing
social crisis stemming from corporate globalization, rural and urban
disinvestment, institutional racism, misplaced public priorities, and
widespread political corruption. The standard media frame of striking
teachers leaving children without education or inconveniencing the
public ignores the dilapidated conditions of many schools, overcrowded
classrooms, and inadequate investment in the sector.
U.S. Democratic
Party campaign pledges to renegotiate the North American Free Trade
Agreement and pass the Employee Free Choice Act have been indefinitely
shelved. As these measures to help out workers gather dust, companies
like Whirlpool ship jobs to Mexico and other low-wage countries where
free trade agreements assure them all the advantages of cheap labor
with few of the regulatory costs.
A New Cross-Border Fightback?
A few combative
unions and their allies are waging defensive struggles against the
neo-liberal offensive. Slammed by budget cuts, thousands of California
college students and higher education workers plan a new round of
protests and campus occupations beginning this week. The movement is
starting to spread to other states, with protests against cuts also
planned in New York and elsewhere. A national organization, Bail out
the People, urges movements to link issues of jobs and education with
stopping wars and occupations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Late last month,
more than 5,000 workers and supporters rallied in Evansville, Indiana,
to protest the transfer of 1,100 Whirlpool production jobs to Mexico.
Cananea is
another focal point of resistance. A February 19-20 worker meeting at
the mine drew representatives of the United Steelworkers of America,
which in turn, had received support from Mexican workers during a 2005
strike against the Grupo Mexico-owned Asarco mining and smelting firm
in Arizona. "You are not alone. We know that the working and living
conditions of one group of workers affects the conditions of others,"
USW representative Jim Robinson told the large gathering. "The struggle
of the mineros against Grupo Mexico affects the struggle of the
Steelworkers against Grupo Mexico in Arizona … Mexico's National
Workers Union, a federation representing telephone company workers,
pilots, university workers, and others recently announced it will help
maintain a "security belt" around the mine to stave off a police or
military assault.
But some
pro-labor activists maintain much more needs to be done. Until now,
most union struggles have stayed safely confined within the narrow
parameters of one issue, said Jose Maldonado of Aguascalientes' Aqui
Estamos organization, a group that supports the movement of opposition
leader Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador. Little by little, the government
has picked off the movements, Maldonado contended. "All that remains
for it to do is get rid of the mine workers," Maldonado said.
"Unfortunately, there is a lack of unity and everyone is looking out
for their own interests," he added. "What they don't realize is that
sooner or later the government will come after them."
Meantime, the clock ticks in Cananea. Quoted in Proceso
magazine shortly before the February 11 court decision came down,
strike committee leader Jesus Verdugo said the miners were ready for
anything. "If what they want are martyrs in Cananea, then they will
find them here," Verdugo said. "At the doors of the mine." As in 1906,
the Cananea showdown could presage which way the wind blows in Mexico.
And perhaps even in the United States.
CIP Americas Program