U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar said Thursday that border officials have
broadened their request to fly an unmanned aircraft in Texas to allow
the drone to cruise along the Gulf of Mexico as well as the Rio Grande.
Cuellar, a Democrat from Laredo , also said that Federal Aviation
Administration chief Randy Babbitt would work as quickly as possible on
the request.
The plane, which would be based in Corpus Christi,
is expected to be approved by this summer and begin operating by the
fall, Cuellar said Thursday after hosting a meeting between officials
from the FAA and Customs and Border Protection.
"These aircraft
will increasingly become a familiar means for providing homeland
security," Cuellar said in a statement. "The real time intelligence
they provide will benefit our domestic security strategy and give us a
new tool to meet the evolving threats of the 21st century."
Customs
and Border Protection officials' original request to the FAA asked only
for permission to fly a single surveillance aircraft out of Corpus
Christi and along the Rio Grande.
It is intended to help Customs and Border Protection officials search for drug smugglers and illegal immigration.
Now,
border officials also want to fly a Predator - or possibly a maritime
version called a Guardian - along the Gulf of Mexico up to Louisiana,
Cuellar said.
Customs and Border Protection operates three such
aircraft in Arizona, one of which is permitted to fly over far West
Texas. It also runs two from North Dakota and flies a Guardian out of
Florida with help from the U.S. Coast Guard.
Cuellar also said
that after the American-Statesman raised questions about whether "chase
planes" would be used, he asked Babbitt about the planes, which
sometimes follow behind unmanned aircraft to help prevent accidents.
FAA
and congressional documents from 2003 to 2009 show that the FAA has
sanctioned the use of such planes. A 2007 document noted safety
concerns about the planes possibly interfering with other aircraft or
with "persons or property on the ground." In 2009, the FAA said either
a chase plane or an observer on the ground should keep visual contact
with a drone to make sure it would not "interfere with other aircraft."
But Cuellar and others agreed that using chase planes has a downside.
"Of
course, it defeats the whole gain of not having a pilot inside," said
Peter W. Singer, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution who is an
expert on unmanned aircraft. "You are now limited by the endurance of
the chase plane pilot."
Though chase planes do offer another set
of eyes, they also double the number of fast-moving objects that might
crash into one another, said Singer, who was interviewed by e-mail.
Cuellar said Babbitt seemed to agree and said a Corpus Christi-based drone wouldn't require a chase plane.
An
FAA spokesman said Thursday that chase planes now are generally not
necessary in Class A airspace, which is between 18,000 and 60,000 feet.
Texas
officials have been pressing federal officials for years to use an
unmanned craft along the Texas-Mexico border. A spokesman for the FAA
said safety has been the agency's primary concern.
"The FAA has
moved cautiously in this area because of concerns about the ability of
these aircraft to operate in an environment where other nonmilitary
aircraft are present," FAA spokesman Lynn Lunsford said.
The
safety record of Predators lags a bit behind that of manned airplanes,
according to the Department of Defense, the government agency most
familiar with the craft.
The Defense Department, which operates
about 6,800 unmanned aircraft of varying sizes, said there were eight
mishaps per 100,000 flight hours over the past three years for larger
unmanned planes. By comparison, the accident rate for noncommercial
airplanes has been 6.3 accidents per 100,000 flight hours.
Austin-American Statesman