The
United States military is deployed in more than 150 countries around the world.
Despite being spread so widely, fewer than 400,000 of the approximately 1.5
million active-duty personnel are serving outside the US and its territories.
The major places should be obvious – Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya. It’s not
hard to imagine how the expression ‘Yankee, Go Home’ arose. It’s not hard to
imagine why the US is resented around the world.
Although
its closest neighbour – Canada – has traditionally been seen as a quiet ally of
the US, it has tended to shy away from intruding in foreign countries like its
big brother to the south. That’s about to change.
While
there is no way Canada could ever become a US-style military behemoth, it is
about to start opening up military branch plants in foreign countries. The government
announced this in May, with the same degree of solemnity they would give to
opening a new shopping mall. Although government officials put on their serious
faces when they talk about these things, the ‘ain’t-we-tough-guys’ smirk behind
their words is clear to see.
Canada
declined to join George Bush the Younger’s ‘coalition of the willing’ in Iraq,
with great fanfare in Canada and a surge of Canadian pride that the government
had stood up to pretty aggressive pressure from Washington. The fact is,
though, that Canada did indeed send troops to Iraq – some as logistical staff,
some under the American flag.
Canada
has been engaged in Afghanistan since 2002. Initially, the only task was
logistical support; but they undertook a much larger role in 2006, deploying
combat troops to Kandahar. As early as 2008, though, the government served
notice of its intent to withdraw in July 2011. In fact, while some troops might
go home, a large contingent will remain on the ground, tasked with training the
Afghan police and army. Let’s not get into a discussion here of whether there
is any point to that exercise.
Peacekeepers
There is
an enduring Canadian mythology that the country’s traditional role is keeping
the peace in troubled spots. Indeed, the very concept of a peacekeeping force
is believed to derive from a former Canadian prime minister, Lester Pearson,
who received a Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts – the only Canadian to ever be
so honoured. He was the founder of the United Nations Emergency Force (UNEF) that
was deployed in 1956 to help bring peace in Egypt, following the so-called Suez
Crisis.
Most
Canadians couldn’t begin to tell you what is meant by the word ‘peacekeeping’, but
they’re sure that’s what Canada does. So let’s look at how the United Nations
describes it:
The United Nations
defines peacekeeping as "the deployment of international military and
civilian personnel to a conflict area with the consent of the parties to the
conflict in order to: stop or contain hostilities or supervise the carrying out
of a peace agreement." While this definition serves as a useful reference
point, no single definition of peacekeeping exists. Peacekeeping continues to
evolve as new conflicts arise and demands to resolve them are increasingly
placed on the UN.
Since the late 1940s, Canada has indeed
contributed to more than 50 missions that fit that description, and it has lost
the second highest number of peacekeepers in the line of duty. But at the
current time, its commitment stands at 55th out of 108
troop-contributing nations, and its financial contribution is very small.
Canada’s
military efforts around the world these days are generally in combat or what is
euphemistically known as ‘nation-building’. But, in fact, war is big business
for Canada.
Merchants of death
Canada’s
image, and purpose, is undergoing an overhaul. Its tour of duty in Afghanistan
will end shortly, but the government is already preparing for its next deployment
with a measure of glee that Canada will be seen as playing with the big kids.
They have already reached agreements, in recent months, to open military bases
in Germany and Jamaica; there are ongoing negotiations for further bases in
Senegal, South Korea, Kenya, and Singapore. Defense Minister Peter MacKay
claims that Canada has become a ‘go-to nation’ for response to natural disasters
and NATO/UN missions, and he says this needs a much larger boot print. Hence
the need for military bases abroad. And much bigger boots.
But even before expanding its militarism, Canada
has been quietly serving as a merchant of death. Although it is extremely hard
to find exact numbers, due to deliberate government obfuscation, it is known
that Canada is the world’s sixth largest supplier of weaponry. Not bad for a
country with a smaller population than the state of California.
Most Canadians are oblivious to the efforts of
its government to get a big piece of the action in the killing business. But to
the extent that Canadians know anything at all about the military industry,
they are assured by the federal government that strict guidelines are in place
to ‘control’ the flow of weapons systems – but not actually stop them. Because
of these flexible guidelines, Canada finds its weapons, or weapon components,
in high demand, not only by foreign governments engaged in wars (sometimes
against their own people) but also by ‘business-friendly’ régimes that oppress
their populations through threats, intimidation, and the omnipresence of local brutal
security forces.
Canada reports, through a variety of agencies,
what weapons, or parts of weapons, are produced; but it is a Gordian knot
trying to determine exactly what has gone where. The various agencies report
various things, and it is clear that some reporting is deliberately evasive.
For instance, Canada ships helicopters to the army in Colombia but doesn’t list
this as ‘military equipment’ because the weaponry is not installed in them. The
weaponry is shipped to the US as components where it is assembled and sent to
Colombia separately.
Part of the problem is that the United States
receives about 80% of the weapons and weapons-related materiel produced by
Canada, and they then ship it or use it wherever it suits them. This hides the
contribution Canada makes in arming some of the worst dictators and brutish
régimes, allowing the US to take credit/blame for it. But it is known that, directly or indirectly,
Canada supplies munitions to at least 107 countries that it claims are ‘restricted’
nations.
This is a multi-billion dollar industry for
Canada, and it’s one that is only likely to increase under the present
Conservative government. Although this government is now five years in power,
it is only since May 2011 that it has had a majority and is able to act with
very little restraint. We have already seen Canada declaring its intent to move
further to the right, stepping up to do its part in helping the United States
continue its role as the world’s biggest bully.
So a few Canadian companies will gain increased
wealth, government and military officials will pat themselves on the back for
being decisive and tough – and the rest of the world will pay the price. Thank
God for Canada!
Notes:
As stated, finding consistent and credible data about Canada's arms shipments is anything but easy. While I was able to locate some sources, I was greatly assisted by the article Stoking the Tsunamis of War and Repression: Canada's military exports arm world's most belligerent nations. This fine article by Richard Sanders appears in the May 2011 edition of The CCPA Monitor and can be found online here.
Paul Richard Harris is an Axis of Logic editor and
columnist, based in Canada. He can be reached at paul@axisoflogic.com
Read the Biography and additional articles by Axis
Columnist, Paul Richard Harris