Carl Gustav
Jung, the father of analytical psychology, attributed hypocrisy to individuals
who are unconscious of “the shadow-side” of their nature. From this idea arose
a simple argument: If people better understood their natures, they might love
their neighbors more uprightly. For, as Jung says, “…we are all too prone to
transfer to our fellows the injustice and violence we inflict upon our own
natures.” Yet, of all its incarnations, the hypocrisy of “pure evil” seems worst.
A few simple characteristics define it: perpetrators engender evil
intentionally and
wield it astutely; they inflict wanton destruction on others to their own
benefit; they are inherently evil; and, their victims are innocent, wholesome.
Many psychologists, however, decry this hypocrisy a myth; most evil emanates
from the existences of everyday people. Nevertheless, the above mentioned
qualities of “pure evil” are real, and they, too, do exist. When they crop up,
they warrant investigation.
Marco
Rubio—Cuban-American and conservative politico—addressed the public midday
Wednesday, December 17, 2014. He exposed the deeply hypocritical sentiments
that rest in the everyday political existences of himself and other political Luddites of his ilk. The species of his hypocrisy? Pure evil. Rubio ignorantly railed
against the normalization of US-Cuban relations: “The White House has conceded
everything, and gained little.” He went on to complain about the Cuban
government’s missing commitment to ensuring freedoms of the press, of speech, and
of elections. He fulminated that no binding commitment was made for truly opening
the Internet, the establishment of political parties, or stimulating democracy.
However predictable
Rubio’s address may have been, his comments carelessly teetered on the brink of
absurdity. He cloaked his rant with a thin veneer of polish and quiet anger. Still,
his act was not a testament to his commitment to the Cuban people and their
freedoms, but to his own self-importance as a political phantom. Rather than defrosting
ties with Cuba and normalizing relations with the island nation that Yankee
imperium has shamelessly terrorized and heavily sanctioned for too long, Rubio made
it obvious that he preferred the unneighborly ramifications of America’s
backwards embargo to progress, painting himself anew in the light of asinine recalcitrance.
To discern
Rubio’s hypocrisy made manifest in his speech, and the “pure evil” therein, is,
sadly, easy enough. First, Rubio’s speech underscored that many conservative American
politicians, and like-minded Americans desire to assail Cuba with an economic
stranglehold that can only be categorized as overt terrorism. Thus, Rubio
consigned himself to the position of “poster child” for all those who would
continue to engender this evil embargo intentionally (and in so doing, heavily
mortgaged his political future). Second, as the voice of politicians like Rubio
eclipse with the dismal flowing tide of anti-Castro sentiment that once
inculcated an uninformed American public, so also the platform on which
anti-Castro/pro-embargo politicians like Rubio are perennially elected will crumble
under the weight of its own bloated unimportance. Thus, that Rubio would see
the morally corrupt embargo on Cuba continued ad infinitum effectively shows
that he would, without shame, stump on the US-sponsored misery of Cubans until,
like a tantrum-bound child, he get his way in full. Rubio and his kind would
inflict that misery to their own benefit forever; and yet, his victims—the
Cuban people—are ultimately blameless in the whole thing. Even if Rubio himself
is not “inherently evil,” what his political speech evinced that he wants
certainly is.
“This
entire policy shift announced today,” Rubio argued, “is based on an illusion, on
a lie—the lie and the illusion that more commerce and access to money and goods
will translate to political freedom for the Cuban people.” Blind with
hypocrisy, Rubio creates a straw man out of the very thing he would see cripple
his “beloved” Cuba forever. To claim that unfurling US-Cuban relations and
subsequent economic developments portend no extension of political freedoms to
Cubans is not an informed attack on the Obama regime’s actions, but a dagger
stabbed deftly into the heart of the embargo’s very raison d'être!
The
hypocritical confusion visited upon Rubio did not stop with his admission to
miscomprehending the embargo. “All this is going to do is give the Castro
regime, which controls every aspect of Cuban life, the opportunity to
manipulate these changes, to perpetuate itself in power,” he said. One might well
ask how Rubio can claim himself a champion of Cuban freedoms if he would sooner
see them hijacked by the embargo of his own government’s making. To claim that Raúl
Castro’s administration controls every aspect of Cuban life without so much as
broaching the vile and undemocratic US embargo is not even a successful attempt
at a red herring; it is plainly ludicrous.
Rubio
preached how change “will only lead to greater wealth and influence for this
repressive regime—especially the military, which controls most, if not all, of
the Cuban economy, and controls all of its oppressed people.” What about
Rubio’s own government, the one he serves and in which he is entirely complicit?
The US relies on worldwide arms exports and drone assassinations to secure its
hegemony of terrorism. In fact, the American share in the international arms
market approaches 80 percent. Rubio’s own government continues to inflict heavy
burdens on other countries with a capitalist system so as to supply them with
arms. America’s mass manufacture of arms is owed not only to coercive political
motives; it is an irremovable pillar of the American economy. The US has gained
from selling arms to countries that it politically and economically represses
with its capitalist system. But to harangue Cuba for military control without
addressing the military-industrial complex’s endeavors of the American
government does not lend Rubio’s plea any credibility apropos maintaining the
embargo.
Some
of Rubio’s final words were the saddest of all. He claimed these changes “will
lead to legitimacy for a government that shamelessly, continuously, abuses
human rights; but it will not lead to assistance for those whose rights are
being abused.” How, exactly, has America’s half-a-century long economic chokehold
on Cuba bolstered human rights there? How is the normalizing of relations not a step in approaching assistance for
those who need it most? Rubio called these developments “another concession to
a tyranny” rather than “a defense of every universal and inalienable right that
our country was founded on and stands for.” But, how exactly does continuing the embargo and maintaining a supercilious, egotistically
aloof distance from Cuba sound an “American”
defense of its values abroad? Rubio averred, in sum, that “these changes…will significantly
set back the hopes of freedom and democracy for the Cuban people.” To dismiss
the revolutionary successes, though, to outright deny the bravery, the
endurance, the incredible struggle, and epic human perseverance of the Cuban
people in the face of one of history’s greatest instances of adversity reeks of
disrespect and unawareness. Ultimately, it gives voice to the pure evil of
Rubio’s anti-Cuban hypocrisy.
Mateo Pimentel is an Axis of Logic columnist, living on the US-Mexico border.
Read the Biography and additional articles by Axis Columnist Mateo Pimentel
© Copyright 2014 by AxisofLogic.com
This material is available for republication as long as reprints include verbatim copy of the article in its entirety, respecting its integrity. Reprints must cite the author and Axis of Logic as the original source including a "live link" to the article. Thank you!
|